Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 9, 2022·Honda Center, Anaheim

Detroit Red Wings 3, Anaheim Ducks 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 63% of the time.

ANA winsDET wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
DET010213110030336
ANA11016111002427

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:32ANATrevor ZegrasPPAssists: Cam Fowler, Rickard Rakell · Slap, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P2 0:21DETFilip HronekPPAssists: Moritz Seider, Tyler Bertuzzi · Slap, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P2 15:07DETTyler BertuzziAssists: Marc Staal, Lucas Raymond · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 18:04ANATroy TerryAssists: Sonny Milano, Ryan Getzlaf · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–2
  5. P3 2:01ANAMaxime ComtoisAssists: Rickard Rakell, Trevor Zegras · Tip-in, 0.15 xG2–3
  6. P3 7:55DETVladislav NamestnikovAssists: Jordan Oesterle, Michael Rasmussen · Deflected, 0.11 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Troy Terry stopped
  2. 2. DET Lucas Raymond stopped
  3. 3. ANA Trevor Zegras scored
  4. 4. DET Adam Erne stopped
  5. 5. ANA Rickard Rakell scored
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 6:07DETGivani Smith: Instigator2 min · PPG
  2. P1 6:07ANANicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 6:07DETGivani Smith: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 6:07DETGivani Smith: Misconduct10 min
  5. P1 18:29ANASam Steel: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P1 18:50ANAJosh Manson: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 6:16DETMichael Rasmussen: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 3:18ANAKevin Shattenkirk: Holding2 min
  9. P3 13:40ANAIsac Lundeström: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DET00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
48% to win52% to win
← DET attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Getzlaf won the faceoff against Rasmussen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DETANA
36Shots on goal27
3.3Expected goals2.5
66Shot attempts50
31Faceoffs won29
4Power plays2
19Penalty minutes13
28Hits19
12Blocked shots14
16Giveaways11
6Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestBertuzzi – Larkin – Raymond4:26

    xG 0.50–0.03 (94%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  2. Namestnikov – Erne – Rasmussen11:21

    xG 0.57–0.30 (66%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  3. Gagner – Smith – Veleno5:24

    xG 0.06–0.04 (60%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Fabbri – Suter – Zadina3:36

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOesterle – Seider12:07

    xG 0.47–0.12 (80%)attempts 13–4goals 1–0

  2. Leddy – Hronek16:44

    xG 0.55–0.69 (44%)attempts 12–17goals 0–0

  3. Staal – Lindstrom11:25

    xG 0.42–0.61 (41%)attempts 14–10goals 1–2

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestRakell – Milano – Zegras8:10

    xG 0.45–0.06 (88%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  2. Getzlaf – Milano – Terry5:50

    xG 0.30–0.09 (77%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  3. Silfverberg – Deslauriers – Lundeström3:09

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  4. Rakell – Comtois – Zegras4:13

    xG 0.15–0.19 (44%)attempts 2–4goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Fowler2:02

    xG 0.42–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 1–0

  2. Shattenkirk – Drysdale16:34

    xG 0.75–0.53 (59%)attempts 15–16goals 0–2

  3. Fowler – Manson19:32

    xG 0.64–0.88 (42%)attempts 17–18goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 2.5 xGDET 3.3 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANADET

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #230 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.29 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
DET 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 63% of the time.

ANA winsDET wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − DET), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).