Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 11, 2022·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Colorado Avalanche 4, Nashville Predators 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 61% of the time.

NSH winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
COL0921421605444
NSH212191912532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:32NSHTanner JeannotAssists: Matt Luff, Colton Sissons · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:04NSHLuke KuninAssists: Roman Josi · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P2 8:15COLNicolas Aube-KubelAssists: Nazem Kadri, Cale Makar · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:48COLAndre BurakovskyAssists: Nicolas Aube-Kubel, Samuel Girard · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P2 17:25NSHLuke KuninAssists: Nick Cousins · Deflected, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P3 5:21COLNathan MacKinnonPPAssists: Cale Makar, Nazem Kadri · Slap, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. P3 10:00NSHMatt DuchenePPAssists: Alexandre Carrier, Roman Josi · Deflected, 0.15 xG3–4
  8. P3 13:19COLCale MakarAssists: Valeri Nichushkin, Samuel Girard · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–4
  9. OT 3:01NSHMatt DuchenePPGWGAssists: Roman Josi, Mikael Granlund · Slap, 0.15 xG4–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 4:51NSHDante Fabbro: Interference2 min
  2. P1 8:53NSHEeli Tolvanen: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 19:52COLAlex Newhook: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 4:13NSHRyan Johansen: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P3 4:13COLJack Johnson: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 4:13NSHRyan Johansen: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 8:36COLMikko Rantanen: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  8. P3 18:07COLMikhail Maltsev: Too many men on the ice2 min
  9. OT 2:32COLNicolas Aube-Kubel: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
48% to win52% to win
← COL attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Granlund won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLNSH
44Shots on goal32
3.0Expected goals3.7
70Shot attempts65
32Faceoffs won31
3Power plays5
12Penalty minutes8
14Hits19
12Blocked shots18
12Giveaways5
6Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestKadri – Burakovsky – Aube-Kubel2:45

    xG 0.39–0.15 (73%)attempts 9–2goals 2–0

  2. MacDermid – Jost – Maltsev2:43

    xG 0.31–0.15 (67%)attempts 4–3goals 0–1

  3. Burakovsky – MacKinnon – Nichushkin4:12

    xG 0.21–0.09 (71%)attempts 7–1goals 1–0

  4. Kadri – Aube-Kubel – Rantanen4:49

    xG 0.07–0.04 (64%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Murray3:59

    xG 0.17–0.11 (61%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Johnson – Johnson2:04

    xG 0.08–0.07 (53%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Toews – Makar13:28

    xG 0.71–0.74 (49%)attempts 13–14goals 1–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansen – Cousins – Kunin10:19

    xG 0.75–0.30 (71%)attempts 13–12goals 2–1

  2. Duchene – Granlund – Tolvanen13:35

    xG 0.36–0.40 (48%)attempts 11–12goals 0–1

  3. Sissons – Luff – Jeannot9:08

    xG 0.32–0.38 (45%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

  4. McCarron – Tomasino – Smith5:53

    xG 0.16–0.27 (37%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJosi – Fabbro10:27

    xG 0.61–0.09 (87%)attempts 13–5goals 1–1

  2. Ekholm – Carrier12:32

    xG 0.66–0.43 (60%)attempts 13–14goals 0–0

  3. Ekholm – Fabbro2:58

    xG 0.17–0.03 (85%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.7 xGCOL 3.0 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #31 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.82 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 61% of the time.

NSH winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).