Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 13, 2022·Crypto.com Arena, Los Angeles

Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Los Angeles Kings 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 82% of the time.

LAK winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT1908112229
LAK110120415645

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:42PITKris LetangAssists: Dominik Simon, Brian Dumoulin · Backhand, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 13:48LAKAnze KopitarAssists: Alex Iafallo · Snap, 0.22 xG1–1
  3. P2 14:32LAKDustin BrownPPAssists: Trevor Moore, Sean Durzi · Snap, 0.32 xG1–2
  4. P3 1:37PITRadim ZohornaAssists: Teddy Blueger, Chad Ruhwedel · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P3 3:07LAKMikey AndersonGWGAssists: Anze Kopitar, Adrian Kempe · Slap, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P3 3:17LAKViktor ArvidssonAssists: Trevor Moore, Drew Doughty · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–4
  7. P3 4:30LAKAnze KopitarAssists: Alex Iafallo, Sean Durzi · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–5
  8. P3 18:20LAKSean DurziAssists: Dustin Brown, Rasmus Kupari · Slap, 0.01 xG2–6
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 19:32PITEvgeni Malkin: Interference2 min
  2. P2 12:46PITMike Matheson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 16:37LAKViktor Arvidsson: Slashing2 min
  4. P3 7:24PITMarcus Pettersson: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
48% to win52% to win
← PIT attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kopitar won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITLAK
29Shots on goal45
3.3Expected goals5.8
49Shot attempts70
22Faceoffs won31
1Power plays3
6Penalty minutes2
16Hits15
10Blocked shots12
5Giveaways5
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCarter – Malkin – Kapanen12:54

    xG 1.28–0.87 (60%)attempts 16–14goals 0–2

  2. Boyle – Bjorkqvist – O'Connor7:06

    xG 0.57–0.25 (70%)attempts 7–4goals 0–1

  3. Blueger – Simon – Zohorna10:22

    xG 0.53–0.21 (72%)attempts 10–4goals 2–0

  4. Crosby – Guentzel – Rodrigues15:24

    xG 0.67–1.41 (32%)attempts 11–19goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Matheson – Ruhwedel12:55

    xG 0.49–0.73 (40%)attempts 10–9goals 1–1

  2. Pettersson – Marino13:26

    xG 0.60–0.94 (39%)attempts 10–14goals 0–2

  3. Letang – Dumoulin16:30

    xG 1.01–1.49 (40%)attempts 16–19goals 1–2

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestKopitar – Kempe – Iafallo14:37

    xG 1.47–0.40 (79%)attempts 19–8goals 3–0

  2. Danault – Arvidsson – Moore15:03

    xG 1.72–1.27 (57%)attempts 21–14goals 1–0

  3. Brown – Kupari – Turcotte9:26

    xG 0.37–0.46 (45%)attempts 5–6goals 1–1

  4. Fagemo – Lizotte – Kaliyev10:36

    xG 0.40–1.11 (27%)attempts 8–17goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDoughty – Anderson17:08

    xG 1.52–0.56 (73%)attempts 23–13goals 2–0

  2. Maatta – Roy18:22

    xG 1.22–0.88 (58%)attempts 16–11goals 1–0

  3. Durzi – Bjornfot14:10

    xG 0.85–1.52 (36%)attempts 11–21goals 2–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 5.8 xGPIT 3.3 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 56/100 · #649 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.45 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 37% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 82% of the time.

LAK winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).