Thu, Jan 20, 2022·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia
Columbus Blue Jackets 2, Philadelphia Flyers 1
Three stars
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 65% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBJ | 011 | 114 | 14 | 229 |
| PHI | 09 | 014 | 111 | 134 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 11:53CBJOliver BjorkstrandAssists: Boone Jenner, Sean Kuraly · Backhand, 0.18 xG1–0
- P3 5:50CBJPatrik LaineGWGAssists: Boone Jenner, Dean Kukan · Snap, 0.07 xG2–0
- P3 12:40PHIGerry MayhewAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Scott Laughton · Snap, 0.05 xG2–1
Penalties (11)
- P1 0:28CBJAlexandre Texier: Tripping2 min
- P1 13:10PHIJustin Braun: Roughing2 min
- P1 13:10CBJMax Domi: Roughing2 min
- P1 13:10CBJMax Domi: Roughing2 min
- P2 3:43PHIJustin Braun: Interference2 min
- P2 9:28PHIZack MacEwen: Tripping2 min
- P2 18:27PHIScott Laughton: Roughing2 min
- P2 18:27CBJGavin Bayreuther: Roughing2 min
- P2 18:27CBJGavin Bayreuther: Roughing2 min
- P3 2:44CBJPatrik Laine: Slashing2 min
- P3 6:06PHICam York: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Texier
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Columbus Blue Jackets
Forward lines
- bestVoracek – Laine – Texier8:48
xG 0.70–0.30 (70%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0
- Domi – Roslovic – Bemstrom7:17
xG 0.32–0.24 (57%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1
- Voracek – Jenner – Laine2:39
xG 0.07–0.29 (19%)attempts 1–3goals 1–0
- Nyquist – Jenner – Bjorkstrand7:27
xG 0.22–0.62 (26%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestKukan – Peeke2:01
xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0
- Bean – Christiansen2:05
xG 0.13–0.00 (96%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0
- Kukan – Bayreuther2:13
xG 0.00–0.24 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0
Philadelphia Flyers
Forward lines
- bestLaughton – Lindblom – Konecny7:41
xG 1.05–0.52 (67%)attempts 17–8goals 0–0
- van Riemsdyk – Konecny – Frost2:00
xG 0.28–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0
- Giroux – Atkinson – Farabee10:24
xG 0.43–0.22 (66%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0
- Willman – Bunnaman – MacEwen7:41
xG 0.38–0.27 (58%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestYandle – Ristolainen6:15
xG 0.27–0.14 (65%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0
- Ristolainen – Sanheim6:15
xG 0.31–0.21 (59%)attempts 5–6goals 1–0
- Provorov – York3:04
xG 0.05–0.02 (72%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 65% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (PHI − CBJ), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).