Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Jan 21, 2022·United Center, Chicago

Minnesota Wild 5, Chicago Blackhawks 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 67% of the time.

CHI winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN31029011530
CHI01201519136

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:58MINMarcus FolignoAssists: Calen Addison · Wrist, 0.29 xG1–0
  2. P1 4:07MINRyan HartmanGWGAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Mats Zuccarello · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P1 17:12MINRyan HartmanAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Kirill Kaprizov · Slap, 0.06 xG3–0
  4. P2 12:05MINCalen AddisonAssists: Marcus Foligno, Jon Merrill · Slap, 0.03 xG4–0
  5. P2 16:26MINBrandon DuhaimeAssists: Kevin Fiala, Dmitry Kulikov · Wrist, 0.08 xG5–0
  6. P3 14:57CHIDylan StromeAssists: Patrick Kane, Brandon Hagel · Snap, 0.07 xG5–1
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 0:22MINMarcus Foligno: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 8:06MINMats Zuccarello: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 12:42MINBrandon Duhaime: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 12:42CHIRiley Stillman: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 12:42MINConnor Dewar: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 12:42CHIMacKenzie Entwistle: Fighting5 min
  7. P1 12:42CHIMacKenzie Entwistle: Game misconduct10 min
  8. P1 12:42MINConnor Dewar: Game misconduct10 min
  9. P2 3:17CHIJonathan Toews: High sticking2 min
  10. P2 7:50MINMats Zuccarello: Too many men on the ice2 min
  11. P3 1:49CHIRyan Carpenter: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
48% to win52% to win
← MIN attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lafferty won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCHI
30Shots on goal36
2.8Expected goals1.8
58Shot attempts56
23Faceoffs won21
2Power plays3
26Penalty minutes24
23Hits29
11Blocked shots19
8Giveaways12
6Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestGaudreau – Fiala – Boldy12:41

    xG 1.08–0.45 (70%)attempts 19–16goals 0–1

  2. Foligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek9:45

    xG 0.22–0.17 (57%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  3. Zuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov13:01

    xG 0.30–0.29 (51%)attempts 11–17goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMerrill – Addison13:45

    xG 0.98–0.44 (69%)attempts 13–16goals 3–1

  2. Benn – Dumba14:55

    xG 0.76–0.23 (77%)attempts 21–10goals 1–0

  3. Goligoski – Kulikov16:04

    xG 0.60–0.34 (64%)attempts 15–18goals 1–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestKubalik – Kurashev – Dach6:08

    xG 0.13–0.06 (69%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  2. Toews – Carpenter – DeBrincat2:56

    xG 0.14–0.08 (65%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Kane – Strome – Hagel15:07

    xG 0.54–0.56 (49%)attempts 19–9goals 1–0

  4. Carpenter – Lafferty – Hardman5:57

    xG 0.13–0.17 (43%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurphy – Gustafsson3:39

    xG 0.27–0.08 (77%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  2. de Haan – Gustafsson3:38

    xG 0.17–0.03 (86%)attempts 3–1goals 0–1

  3. Gustafsson – Stillman3:49

    xG 0.09–0.07 (55%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 1.8 xGMIN 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1143 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.60 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 67% of the time.

CHI winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).