Mon, Jan 24, 2022·Ball Arena, Denver
Chicago Blackhawks 0, Colorado Avalanche 2
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 56% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 010 | 07 | 07 | 024 |
| COL | 08 | 115 | 16 | 229 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 11:24COLNazem KadriPPGWGAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Cale Makar · Slap, 0.08 xG0–1
- P3 6:41COLMikko RantanenAssists: Gabriel Landeskog, Devon Toews · Backhand, 0.08 xG0–2
Penalties (3)
- P1 13:04COLDevon Toews: Tripping2 min
- P1 19:40CHIBrandon Hagel: Tripping2 min
- P2 9:55CHISeth Jones: Interference2 min · PPG
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Dach
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Chicago Blackhawks
Forward lines
- bestCarpenter – Borgstrom – Entwistle6:06
xG 0.39–0.05 (88%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0
- Toews – Lafferty – DeBrincat9:34
xG 0.47–0.44 (51%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1
- Kubalik – Kurashev – Dach10:37
xG 0.26–0.39 (40%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0
- Kane – Strome – Hagel11:43
xG 0.36–0.56 (39%)attempts 12–14goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestde Haan – Murphy6:21
xG 0.44–0.06 (88%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0
- Murphy – Jones7:06
xG 0.44–0.10 (82%)attempts 13–2goals 0–0
- Gustafsson – Jones8:53
xG 0.11–0.04 (74%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0
Colorado Avalanche
Forward lines
- bestLandeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen15:49
xG 0.68–0.48 (58%)attempts 15–12goals 1–0
- Kadri – Burakovsky – Nichushkin8:59
xG 0.59–0.41 (59%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0
- Aube-Kubel – Jost – Maltsev4:46
xG 0.21–0.05 (80%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0
- Compher – O'Connor – Newhook3:04
xG 0.09–0.05 (62%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestGirard – Makar5:48
xG 0.41–0.07 (85%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0
- Johnson – Girard4:46
xG 0.27–0.06 (81%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0
- Johnson – Johnson4:37
xG 0.35–0.17 (68%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 56% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (COL − CHI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).