Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 26, 2022·Scotiabank Arena, Toronto

Anaheim Ducks 3, Toronto Maple Leafs 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 90% of the time.

TOR winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
ANA161618011321
TOR21711409042444

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:46ANASam SteelUnassisted · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:18TORMitch MarnerPPAssists: Morgan Rielly, William Nylander · Slap, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:21TORWilliam NylanderPPAssists: John Tavares, Auston Matthews · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P2 16:08TORJohn TavaresPPAssists: Mitch Marner, Auston Matthews · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:21ANAJakob SilfverbergAssists: Buddy Robinson, Sam Carrick · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–3
  6. P3 13:23ANAVinni LettieriAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, Sam Steel · Tip-in, 0.14 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. TOR Jason Spezza scored
  2. 2. ANA Trevor Zegras scored
  3. 3. TOR Auston Matthews scored
  4. 4. ANA Troy Terry stopped
  5. 5. TOR William Nylander stopped
  6. 6. ANA Rickard Rakell stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 14:27TORTimothy Liljegren: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 16:03ANATroy Terry: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 18:58ANAGreg Pateryn: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 14:44ANAHampus Lindholm: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 15:16ANAJakob Silfverberg: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 2:05TORTravis Dermott: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
48% to win52% to win
← ANA attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kampf won the faceoff against Carrick
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANATOR
21Shots on goal44
1.9Expected goals4.9
40Shot attempts75
27Faceoffs won45
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
24Hits16
17Blocked shots8
15Giveaways18
13Takeaways23

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestSteel – Lettieri – Comtois6:48

    xG 0.69–0.04 (95%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  2. Getzlaf – Terry – Zegras7:53

    xG 0.11–0.20 (36%)attempts 1–9goals 0–0

  3. Silfverberg – Comtois – Zegras3:27

    xG 0.03–0.17 (17%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Silfverberg – Rakell – Lundeström5:24

    xG 0.06–0.39 (13%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPateryn – Benoit9:23

    xG 0.87–0.32 (73%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  2. Shattenkirk – Fowler20:31

    xG 0.23–1.08 (18%)attempts 8–22goals 1–0

  3. Lindholm – Drysdale17:41

    xG 0.24–1.09 (18%)attempts 12–17goals 0–0

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestTavares – Marner – Mikheyev8:08

    xG 0.80–0.11 (88%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  2. Bunting – Kase – Matthews11:44

    xG 0.47–0.09 (84%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  3. Kerfoot – Nylander – Kampf7:04

    xG 0.22–0.05 (80%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Tavares – Nylander – Marner3:35

    xG 0.19–0.18 (51%)attempts 5–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHoll – Sandin11:15

    xG 0.74–0.19 (79%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  2. Dermott – Sandin2:37

    xG 0.31–0.03 (92%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Brodie – Rielly15:46

    xG 1.05–0.78 (57%)attempts 20–9goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 4.9 xGANA 1.9 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 75/100 · #397 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.84 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 35% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 90% of the time.

TOR winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).