Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 10, 2022·FLA Live Arena, Sunrise

Philadelphia Flyers 3, Florida Panthers 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 72% of the time.

FLA winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI01531606337
FLA41807212637

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:26FLACarter VerhaegheAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Aaron Ekblad · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:12FLASam ReinhartPPAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Aaron Ekblad · Tip-in, 0.12 xG0–2
  3. P1 18:11FLASam ReinhartPPAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Aleksander Barkov · Wrist, 0.31 xG0–3
  4. P1 19:30FLACarter VerhaegheGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–4
  5. P2 9:01PHIJames van RiemsdykAssists: Kevin Hayes · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–4
  6. P2 12:23PHICam AtkinsonAssists: Derick Brassard, Claude Giroux · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–4
  7. P2 18:52PHITravis KonecnyPPAssists: Cam York, Rasmus Ristolainen · Tip-in, 0.09 xG3–4
  8. P3 6:59FLAAnthony DuclairPPAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Aaron Ekblad · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–5
  9. P3 17:54FLASam ReinhartENAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Aaron Ekblad · Backhand, 0.78 xG3–6
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 6:52FLACarter Verhaeghe: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 13:03PHIRasmus Ristolainen: High sticking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 17:49PHIRasmus Ristolainen: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P1 19:58FLASam Bennett: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 7:03PHITravis Konecny: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 7:03FLAPetteri Lindbohm: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 16:47FLAMaxim Mamin: Fighting5 min · PPG
  8. P2 16:47PHIJames van Riemsdyk: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 17:16FLACarter Verhaeghe: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 6:23PHIGerry Mayhew: Tripping2 min · PPG
  11. P3 14:05FLAMason Marchment: Slashing2 min
  12. P3 14:05PHIZack MacEwen: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 14:05PHIZack MacEwen: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
48% to win52% to win
← PHI attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Brassard won the faceoff against Barkov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIFLA
37Shots on goal37
3.3Expected goals4.8
66Shot attempts72
35Faceoffs won36
3Power plays3
28Penalty minutes18
33Hits18
22Blocked shots22
12Giveaways12
5Takeaways15

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestLaughton – Lindblom – Konecny3:53

    xG 0.35–0.11 (76%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  2. van Riemsdyk – Hayes – Farabee7:51

    xG 0.39–0.37 (51%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  3. Brown – Lindblom – Konecny3:18

    xG 0.17–0.18 (49%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Hayes – Mayhew – Farabee2:00

    xG 0.00–0.19 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestYandle – York8:32

    xG 0.71–0.61 (54%)attempts 14–11goals 0–1

  2. Ristolainen – Sanheim18:36

    xG 0.94–1.03 (48%)attempts 16–26goals 1–1

  3. Braun – Provorov16:09

    xG 0.49–1.14 (30%)attempts 12–21goals 1–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestVerhaeghe – Barkov – Mamin10:37

    xG 1.09–0.16 (87%)attempts 21–6goals 2–0

  2. Reinhart – Marchment – Luostarinen9:37

    xG 0.54–0.25 (69%)attempts 18–4goals 0–0

  3. Hornqvist – Vatrano – Acciari8:03

    xG 0.29–0.25 (54%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  4. Huberdeau – Duclair – Bennett7:48

    xG 0.65–1.04 (38%)attempts 7–19goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeegar – Ekblad14:43

    xG 1.38–0.22 (86%)attempts 25–8goals 1–0

  2. Ekblad – Forsling2:30

    xG 0.18–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Weegar – Montour2:07

    xG 0.21–0.11 (66%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 4.8 xGPHI 3.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #190 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.03 · 8 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 72% of the time.

FLA winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).