Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 17, 2022·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Nashville Predators 4, Philadelphia Flyers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 73% of the time.

PHI winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH01138115434
PHI11721125533

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:44PHITravis SanheimUnassisted · Backhand, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P2 0:23NSHTanner JeannotAssists: Colton Sissons · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:22PHICam YorkPPAssists: Travis Konecny, Joel Farabee · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P2 3:48PHIJames van RiemsdykAssists: Cam Atkinson, Derick Brassard · Snap, 0.16 xG1–3
  5. P2 5:16NSHPhilippe MyersAssists: Roman Josi, Nick Cousins · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–3
  6. P2 16:05NSHRyan JohansenPPAssists: Mikael Granlund, Roman Josi · Deflected, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. P3 1:11NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: Roman Josi, Matt Duchene · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–3
  8. P3 15:45PHIKevin HayesAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen · Deflected, 0.24 xG4–4
  9. P3 18:41PHIJoel FarabeeGWGAssists: Kevin Hayes, Travis Sanheim · Wrist, 0.15 xG4–5
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 7:00PHIZack MacEwen: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 7:00NSHMichael McCarron: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 7:52NSHRoman Josi: Boarding2 min
  4. P1 10:29NSHMattias Ekholm: Interference2 min
  5. P1 11:07PHIClaude Giroux: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 1:13NSHMatt Duchene: Interference2 min · PPG
  7. P2 6:03NSHColton Sissons: High sticking2 min
  8. P2 8:26PHIZack MacEwen: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 15:08PHITravis Konecny: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  10. P3 14:17NSHMattias Ekholm: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 14:17PHIJoel Farabee: Holding the stick2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
48% to win52% to win
← NSH attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Sissons
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHPHI
34Shots on goal33
2.1Expected goals3.4
65Shot attempts50
37Faceoffs won34
4Power plays4
15Penalty minutes15
38Hits32
8Blocked shots20
6Giveaways5
3Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestDuchene – Johansen – Forsberg8:39

    xG 0.73–0.19 (79%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  2. Sissons – Trenin – Jeannot11:51

    xG 0.25–0.24 (52%)attempts 15–6goals 1–1

  3. Granlund – Kunin – Tolvanen9:37

    xG 0.19–0.36 (34%)attempts 12–6goals 0–1

  4. Cousins – McCarron – Tomasino6:14

    xG 0.18–0.65 (22%)attempts 7–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJosi – Fabbro2:02

    xG 0.26–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  2. Josi – Myers8:41

    xG 0.51–0.39 (57%)attempts 11–11goals 2–0

  3. Ekholm – Fabbro2:36

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestBrown – Willman – MacEwen6:47

    xG 0.84–0.14 (86%)attempts 11–5goals 0–1

  2. Giroux – Konecny – Frost11:20

    xG 0.48–0.24 (67%)attempts 11–11goals 0–1

  3. Brassard – van Riemsdyk – Atkinson7:39

    xG 0.48–0.35 (58%)attempts 8–8goals 1–1

  4. Hayes – Lindblom – Farabee9:38

    xG 0.18–0.13 (59%)attempts 3–10goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestProvorov – York7:37

    xG 0.74–0.11 (87%)attempts 9–5goals 0–1

  2. Ristolainen – Sanheim15:19

    xG 1.04–0.88 (54%)attempts 18–19goals 2–1

  3. Yandle – York5:14

    xG 0.19–0.19 (50%)attempts 7–6goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.4 xGNSH 2.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHINSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #34 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.75 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 11% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 73% of the time.

PHI winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).