Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 17, 2022·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, St. Louis Blues 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 81% of the time.

STL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PIT19117015041345
STL081617040225

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:42PITChad RuhwedelAssists: Marcus Pettersson, Radim Zohorna · Slap, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P2 10:52PITMike MathesonAssists: Kasperi Kapanen, John Marino · Snap, 0.04 xG2–0
  3. P2 16:55STLDavid PerronAssists: Ivan Barbashev, Colton Parayko · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P3 1:49STLIvan BarbashevAssists: Brandon Saad · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. STL Jordan Kyrou stopped
  2. 2. PIT Jake Guentzel stopped
  3. 3. STL David Perron stopped
  4. 4. PIT Sidney Crosby stopped
  5. 5. STL Vladimir Tarasenko stopped
  6. 6. PIT Kris Letang stopped
  7. 7. STL Ryan O'Reilly stopped
  8. 8. PIT Bryan Rust scored
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 0:09PITKris Letang: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 0:35PITJeff Carter: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 15:58STLMarco Scandella: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 1:30PITChad Ruhwedel: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 5:34STLDavid Perron: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 13:06STLDavid Perron: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 17:54PITDominik Simon: Too many men on the ice2 min
  8. P3 8:11PITEvgeni Malkin: Interference2 min
  9. P3 10:06STLIvan Barbashev: Slashing2 min
  10. OT 5:00STLPavel Buchnevich: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
48% to win52% to win
← PIT attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITSTL
45Shots on goal25
4.9Expected goals2.6
77Shot attempts44
27Faceoffs won29
4Power plays5
10Penalty minutes10
17Hits30
7Blocked shots16
7Giveaways7
22Takeaways20

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCarter – Kapanen – Zohorna8:14

    xG 0.49–0.08 (86%)attempts 11–4goals 2–0

  2. Crosby – Guentzel – Rodrigues10:20

    xG 0.80–0.44 (64%)attempts 15–7goals 0–1

  3. Malkin – Rust – Heinen8:56

    xG 0.44–0.26 (63%)attempts 10–4goals 0–1

  4. Boyle – Blueger – Simon7:10

    xG 0.15–0.33 (31%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMatheson – Marino13:31

    xG 1.13–0.31 (78%)attempts 25–4goals 1–1

  2. Letang – Dumoulin11:37

    xG 0.78–0.48 (62%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  3. Ruhwedel – Pettersson8:51

    xG 0.43–0.14 (75%)attempts 12–4goals 1–1

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. Saad – Sundqvist – Barbashev3:45

    xG 0.09–0.06 (60%)attempts 1–4goals 1–0

  2. Schenn – Tarasenko – Kyrou4:46

    xG 0.08–0.06 (56%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Perron – O'Reilly – Kyrou3:38

    xG 0.21–0.24 (47%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Buchnevich – Barbashev – Brown2:33

    xG 0.05–0.14 (27%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Scandella – Parayko13:11

    xG 0.75–0.81 (48%)attempts 13–11goals 2–0

  2. Parayko – Mikkola2:36

    xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  3. Faulk – Parayko2:21

    xG 0.00–0.16 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.6 xGPIT 4.9 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 75/100 · #398 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.86 · 4 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 81% of the time.

STL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).