Fri, Mar 18, 2022·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary
Buffalo Sabres 1, Calgary Flames 0 (OT)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 51% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUF | 07 | 010 | 012 | 15 | 134 |
| CGY | 06 | 08 | 010 | 00 | 024 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- OT 3:07BUFTage ThompsonGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.28 xG1–0
Penalties (6)
- P1 0:30BUFKyle Okposo: Hooking2 min
- P2 7:57CGYNoah Hanifin: Hooking2 min
- P2 15:44CGYChris Tanev: Slashing2 min
- P3 4:42CGYMikael Backlund: Hooking2 min
- P3 6:15CGYTyler Toffoli: Roughing2 min
- P3 6:15BUFDylan Cozens: Roughing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Eakin won the faceoff against Lindholm
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Buffalo Sabres
Forward lines
- bestSkinner – Tuch – Thompson9:16
xG 0.62–0.49 (56%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0
- Hinostroza – Krebs – Cozens8:14
xG 0.44–0.34 (56%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0
- Olofsson – Asplund – Mittelstadt11:31
xG 0.20–0.47 (30%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0
- Okposo – Eakin – Girgensons11:15
xG 0.27–0.93 (23%)attempts 8–15goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Pysyk – Hagg11:21
xG 0.29–0.28 (51%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0
- Bryson – Samuelsson17:46
xG 0.74–0.81 (48%)attempts 13–14goals 0–0
- Jokiharju – Dahlin16:03
xG 0.65–0.83 (44%)attempts 14–16goals 0–0
Calgary Flames
Forward lines
- bestGaudreau – Lindholm – Tkachuk14:59
xG 1.19–0.36 (77%)attempts 15–13goals 0–0
- Jarnkrok – Toffoli – Mangiapane8:21
xG 0.47–0.47 (50%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0
- Lucic – Monahan – Dube8:40
xG 0.24–0.27 (47%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0
- Lewis – Backlund – Coleman10:08
xG 0.12–0.34 (26%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestTanev – Kylington13:12
xG 1.15–0.29 (80%)attempts 18–8goals 0–0
- Tanev – Hanifin2:13
xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0
- Hanifin – Andersson17:28
xG 0.70–0.72 (49%)attempts 10–14goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 51% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (CGY − BUF), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).