Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Mar 21, 2022·Honda Center, Anaheim

Nashville Predators 6, Anaheim Ducks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 72% of the time.

ANA winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH11011249631
ANA11011019329

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:18ANADerek GrantAssists: Jamie Drysdale, Trevor Zegras · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:48NSHRoman JosiAssists: Philip Tomasino, Nick Cousins · Snap, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:02NSHRyan JohansenPPAssists: Filip Forsberg, Mikael Granlund · Slap, 0.39 xG2–1
  4. P2 11:26ANATroy TerryAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, Trevor Zegras · Snap, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P3 1:45NSHFilip ForsbergUnassisted · Snap, 0.20 xG3–2
  6. P3 3:08NSHMatt DuchenePPGWGAssists: Filip Forsberg, Mikael Granlund · Wrist, 0.19 xG4–2
  7. P3 10:13ANADerek GrantAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, Cam Fowler · Wrist, 0.22 xG4–3
  8. P3 11:23NSHMatt DuchenePPAssists: Filip Forsberg, Roman Josi · Snap, 0.10 xG5–3
  9. P3 17:57NSHFilip ForsbergENAssists: Ryan Johansen, Matt Duchene · Tip-in, 0.79 xG6–3
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 3:50NSHMark Borowiecki: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 6:11ANASam Carrick: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 6:11NSHTanner Jeannot: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 2:49ANAMaxime Comtois: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  5. P2 16:05NSHMark Borowiecki: Interference2 min
  6. P2 16:05ANAAndrej Sustr: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 16:05NSHMark Borowiecki: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 2:29ANAVinni Lettieri: High sticking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 4:33NSHMikael Granlund: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 7:55NSHJeremy Lauzon: Holding2 min
  11. P3 11:01ANAGerry Mayhew: Tripping2 min · PPG
  12. P3 12:38ANAKevin Shattenkirk: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 18:50ANASam Carrick: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 18:50NSHMark Borowiecki: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
48% to win52% to win
← NSH attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lundeström won the faceoff against Sissons
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHANA
31Shots on goal29
4.3Expected goals2.8
52Shot attempts66
28Faceoffs won26
5Power plays4
20Penalty minutes22
25Hits20
16Blocked shots8
8Giveaways9
3Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestSissons – Trenin – Jeannot7:18

    xG 0.43–0.09 (82%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Granlund – Kunin – Tolvanen9:04

    xG 0.16–0.33 (32%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  3. Duchene – Johansen – Forsberg10:16

    xG 0.66–0.86 (44%)attempts 11–17goals 1–1

  4. Cousins – McCarron – Tomasino8:53

    xG 0.25–0.73 (25%)attempts 5–15goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBorowiecki – Tennyson10:28

    xG 0.58–0.41 (59%)attempts 7–9goals 1–0

  2. Josi – Carrier2:02

    xG 0.22–0.06 (79%)attempts 6–1goals 1–0

  3. Lauzon – Carrier13:05

    xG 0.45–0.38 (54%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGrant – Terry – Zegras8:24

    xG 0.50–0.34 (59%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  2. Carrick – Steel – Lundeström6:04

    xG 0.33–0.28 (54%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  3. Henrique – Grant – Terry2:11

    xG 0.06–0.03 (70%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. O'Regan – Robinson – Lettieri3:32

    xG 0.16–0.13 (55%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSustr – Benoit13:27

    xG 0.66–0.45 (59%)attempts 15–8goals 0–0

  2. Shattenkirk – Fowler2:46

    xG 0.30–0.17 (63%)attempts 3–5goals 1–0

  3. Shattenkirk – Mahura11:59

    xG 0.52–0.42 (56%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 2.8 xGNSH 4.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANANSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #273 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.87 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 72% of the time.

ANA winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).