Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Mar 23, 2022·Ball Arena, Denver

Vancouver Canucks 3, Colorado Avalanche 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 63% of the time.

COL winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN090939327
COL011012110133

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P3 1:23VANBrock BoeserAssists: Elias Pettersson · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P3 3:15VANJ.T. MillerGWGAssists: Tanner Pearson, Conor Garland · Backhand, 0.22 xG2–0
  3. P3 6:15COLNazem KadriPPAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Valeri Nichushkin · Wrist, 0.24 xG2–1
  4. P3 19:42VANBo HorvatENAssists: J.T. Miller, Tanner Pearson · Backhand, 0.79 xG3–1
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 7:13COLNathan MacKinnon: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 8:50VANNic Petan: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 14:42COLAndrew Cogliano: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 14:42VANOliver Ekman-Larsson: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 14:03VANQuinn Hughes: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 17:51VANQuinn Hughes: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 5:00VANVasily Podkolzin: Interference2 min · PPG
  8. P3 11:12VANLuke Schenn: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
48% to win52% to win
← VAN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Miller won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCOL
27Shots on goal33
4.1Expected goals3.3
47Shot attempts58
26Faceoffs won20
1Power plays5
12Penalty minutes4
14Hits26
15Blocked shots8
0Giveaways8
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestHorvat – Boeser – Pettersson9:59

    xG 0.46–0.18 (72%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  2. Miller – Pearson – Garland10:48

    xG 0.63–0.35 (64%)attempts 7–9goals 1–0

  3. Richardson – Lammikko – Highmore6:20

    xG 0.12–0.07 (62%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  4. Chiasson – Petan – Podkolzin5:37

    xG 0.08–0.29 (22%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMyers – Ekman-Larsson13:59

    xG 0.96–0.76 (56%)attempts 13–17goals 1–0

  2. Hunt – Dermott10:12

    xG 0.20–0.04 (84%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  3. Schenn – Hughes13:03

    xG 0.24–0.18 (57%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestCogliano – Helm – Aube-Kubel4:41

    xG 0.33–0.15 (70%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  2. MacKinnon – Nichushkin – Rantanen11:16

    xG 0.51–0.53 (49%)attempts 12–6goals 0–1

  3. O'Connor – Sturm – Newhook4:43

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  4. Kadri – Burakovsky – Compher4:59

    xG 0.15–0.58 (20%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Makar15:21

    xG 0.65–0.52 (56%)attempts 15–10goals 0–0

  2. Johnson – Toews2:16

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Manson9:26

    xG 0.45–0.51 (47%)attempts 10–7goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.3 xGVAN 4.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 21/100 · #1073 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.09 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 63% of the time.

COL winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).