Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 31, 2022·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Minnesota Wild 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 58% of the time.

MIN winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT192160717439
MIN1141101502331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:06PITRickard RakellAssists: John Marino, Jason Zucker · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:51MINMathew DumbaPPAssists: Matt Boldy · Wrist, 0.32 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:54PITJake GuentzelPPAssists: Kris Letang, Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–1
  4. P2 9:49PITRickard RakellAssists: Sidney Crosby · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–1
  5. P2 17:48MINFrederick GaudreauAssists: Kevin Fiala, Matt Boldy · Slap, 0.07 xG3–2
  6. P3 1:02MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Ryan Hartman, Jared Spurgeon · Snap, 0.14 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:57PITEvgeni MalkinGWGAssists: Bryan Rust, John Marino · Wrist, 0.26 xG4–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 6:48MINMats Zuccarello: Holding2 min
  2. P1 7:10PITKris Letang: Interference2 min
  3. P1 9:22PITBrian Dumoulin: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 15:16PITEvan Rodrigues: Cross checking2 min
  5. P1 19:32MINBrandon Duhaime: Cross checking2 min
  6. P2 1:46MINBrandon Duhaime: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 4:54MINMats Zuccarello: Too many men on the ice2 min
  8. P2 13:27PITJeff Carter: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 3:54MINDmitry Kulikov: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
48% to win52% to win
← PIT attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eriksson Ek won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITMIN
39Shots on goal31
3.1Expected goals3.5
67Shot attempts65
37Faceoffs won30
5Power plays4
8Penalty minutes10
19Hits12
11Blocked shots17
8Giveaways3
10Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. Malkin – Zucker – Rakell4:09

    xG 0.09–0.05 (66%)attempts 2–1goals 1–0

  2. Boyle – Blueger – Kapanen3:18

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel10:33

    xG 0.31–0.30 (51%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  4. Malkin – Rakell – Blueger2:12

    xG 0.03–0.14 (20%)attempts 3–1goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Letang – Dumoulin13:55

    xG 0.42–0.44 (49%)attempts 14–10goals 1–0

  2. Dumoulin – Marino2:20

    xG 0.06–0.11 (34%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Matheson – Marino11:15

    xG 0.42–0.58 (42%)attempts 15–13goals 1–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestZuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov11:08

    xG 0.66–0.26 (71%)attempts 14–9goals 1–1

  2. Foligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek11:30

    xG 0.52–0.19 (73%)attempts 16–7goals 0–0

  3. Deslauriers – Jost – Duhaime6:13

    xG 0.32–0.04 (90%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  4. Gaudreau – Fiala – Kaprizov2:55

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSpurgeon – Middleton6:57

    xG 0.45–0.16 (74%)attempts 11–7goals 1–1

  2. Brodin – Dumba12:23

    xG 0.70–0.49 (59%)attempts 13–14goals 1–1

  3. Kulikov – Merrill3:59

    xG 0.15–0.04 (81%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.5 xGPIT 3.1 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 83/100 · #268 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.01 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 58% of the time.

MIN winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).