Sat, Apr 2, 2022·Ball Arena, Denver
Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Colorado Avalanche 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 66% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 017 | 115 | 18 | 240 |
| COL | 011 | 213 | 114 | 338 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 9:59COLMikko RantanenAssists: Andre Burakovsky, Nathan MacKinnon · Tip-in, 0.24 xG0–1
- P2 14:46PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Kris Letang, Jake Guentzel · Tip-in, 0.23 xG1–1
- P2 15:06COLNicolas Aube-KubelAssists: Alex Newhook, Nico Sturm · Slap, 0.05 xG1–2
- P3 15:07PITMike MathesonAssists: Jake Guentzel · Snap, 0.07 xG2–2
- P3 15:34COLDevon ToewsGWGAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Mikko Rantanen · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–3
Penalties (1)
- P3 15:50COLDarren Helm: Holding2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against MacKinnon
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Pittsburgh Penguins
Forward lines
- bestBlueger – Kapanen – Rodrigues13:34
xG 0.52–0.19 (73%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0
- Crosby – Rust – Guentzel15:00
xG 1.19–0.86 (58%)attempts 27–15goals 2–1
- Boyle – Heinen – Angello5:36
xG 0.01–0.02 (30%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Carter – Malkin – Rakell13:18
xG 0.41–1.45 (22%)attempts 8–20goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestLetang – Dumoulin21:37
xG 1.38–0.98 (58%)attempts 27–17goals 1–2
- Ruhwedel – Friedman12:11
xG 0.25–0.26 (49%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0
- Matheson – Marino18:12
xG 0.77–1.45 (35%)attempts 21–17goals 1–1
Colorado Avalanche
Forward lines
- bestBurakovsky – MacKinnon – Rantanen16:38
xG 1.32–1.05 (56%)attempts 21–23goals 2–2
- Aube-Kubel – Sturm – Newhook5:36
xG 0.54–0.39 (58%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0
- Cogliano – Helm – O'Connor4:53
xG 0.08–0.05 (62%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Compher – Lehkonen – Nichushkin12:42
xG 0.59–0.58 (51%)attempts 12–13goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestManson – Toews13:00
xG 0.90–0.51 (64%)attempts 11–16goals 0–0
- Johnson – Makar13:04
xG 0.31–0.39 (44%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0
- Toews – Makar10:07
xG 0.75–0.94 (44%)attempts 14–16goals 2–2
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 66% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (COL − PIT), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).