Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 3, 2022·Madison Square Garden, New York

Philadelphia Flyers 4, New York Rangers 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 70% of the time.

NYR winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PHI280816041426
NYR013019310040346

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:54PHICam YorkAssists: Nate Thompson · Slap, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P1 6:44PHIOwen TippettAssists: Kevin Hayes · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–0
  3. P3 0:44PHIJoel FarabeeAssists: Travis Sanheim, Oskar Lindblom · Backhand, 0.09 xG3–0
  4. P3 1:22NYRArtemi PanarinAssists: Jacob Trouba, K'Andre Miller · Tip-in, 0.05 xG3–1
  5. P3 15:28NYRMika ZibanejadAssists: Frank Vatrano, Ryan Lindgren · Wrist, 0.20 xG3–2
  6. P3 15:40NYRAndrew CoppAssists: Artemi Panarin, Barclay Goodrow · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. PHI Cam Atkinson stopped
  2. 2. NYR Mika Zibanejad stopped
  3. 3. PHI Owen Tippett stopped
  4. 4. NYR Artemi Panarin stopped
  5. 5. PHI Kevin Hayes scored
  6. 6. NYR Filip Chytil stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 9:07PHIJames van Riemsdyk: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 16:09PHIHayden Hodgson: Holding2 min
  3. P3 2:38NYRRyan Reaves: High sticking2 min
  4. P3 5:11NYRArtemi Panarin: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 16:49PHIHayden Hodgson: Tripping2 min
  6. OT 4:26NYRChris Kreider: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYR
48% to win52% to win
← PHI attackNYR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thompson won the faceoff against Goodrow
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHINYR
26Shots on goal46
2.8Expected goals4.0
37Shot attempts86
30Faceoffs won21
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
28Hits19
20Blocked shots3
6Giveaways6
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestvan Riemsdyk – Hayes – Tippett9:23

    xG 0.59–0.35 (63%)attempts 8–10goals 1–0

  2. Hodgson – Frost – Cates7:10

    xG 0.10–0.20 (34%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Thompson – Brown – Lindblom10:15

    xG 0.09–0.47 (16%)attempts 3–10goals 1–1

  4. Atkinson – Konecny – Farabee10:00

    xG 0.10–1.23 (8%)attempts 3–25goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Provorov – York13:06

    xG 0.44–0.66 (40%)attempts 9–15goals 1–2

  2. Connauton – Attard11:03

    xG 0.31–0.55 (36%)attempts 6–13goals 0–0

  3. Ristolainen – Sanheim17:16

    xG 0.36–0.97 (27%)attempts 6–22goals 1–1

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestGauthier – Chytil – Lafrenière8:34

    xG 0.59–0.27 (68%)attempts 12–4goals 0–1

  2. Kreider – Zibanejad – Vatrano10:29

    xG 0.79–0.55 (59%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  3. Brodzinski – Copp – Panarin7:26

    xG 0.42–0.18 (70%)attempts 11–5goals 0–1

  4. Reaves – Motte – Brodzinski2:04

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTrouba – Miller17:09

    xG 1.06–0.64 (63%)attempts 23–10goals 2–1

  2. Braun – Nemeth11:08

    xG 0.42–0.16 (72%)attempts 12–4goals 0–1

  3. Fox – Lindgren15:22

    xG 0.73–0.59 (56%)attempts 19–9goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYR 4.0 xGPHI 2.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYRPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYR is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #178 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.90 · 6 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 38% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50NYR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 70% of the time.

NYR winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (NYR − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).