Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Apr 8, 2022·FLA Live Arena, Sunrise

Buffalo Sabres 3, Florida Panthers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 80% of the time.

FLA winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF3120307322
FLA113217113443

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:27BUFVictor OlofssonPPAssists: Peyton Krebs · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:25FLAClaude GirouxPPAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Sam Reinhart · Slap, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P1 8:45BUFMark PysykUnassisted · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P1 15:35BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Tage Thompson · Backhand, 0.16 xG3–1
  5. P2 9:30FLAPatric HornqvistAssists: Brandon Montour, Eetu Luostarinen · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P2 14:20FLASam ReinhartPPAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Claude Giroux · Tip-in, 0.15 xG3–3
  7. P3 19:22FLASam BennettGWGAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Brandon Montour · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 4:28FLASam Bennett: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 7:50BUFTage Thompson: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 12:45BUFJeff Skinner: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P2 17:57FLABen Chiarot: Slashing2 min
  5. P3 0:50FLASam Bennett: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 6:06FLAMason Marchment: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 0:00FLASam Bennett: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
48% to win52% to win
← BUF attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eakin won the faceoff against Luostarinen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFFLA
22Shots on goal43
1.8Expected goals3.7
46Shot attempts66
25Faceoffs won24
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes10
20Hits22
13Blocked shots13
17Giveaways14
5Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. Okposo – Eakin – Girgensons9:15

    xG 0.12–0.16 (43%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  2. Olofsson – Asplund – Mittelstadt10:52

    xG 0.20–0.32 (38%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  3. Eakin – Girgensons – Hinostroza2:36

    xG 0.00–0.22 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

  4. Hinostroza – Krebs – Cozens8:26

    xG 0.18–0.80 (18%)attempts 5–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Pysyk – Samuelsson12:45

    xG 0.26–0.82 (24%)attempts 8–16goals 1–0

  2. Miller – Bryson12:55

    xG 0.13–0.90 (12%)attempts 6–19goals 0–0

  3. Jokiharju – Dahlin17:07

    xG 0.35–1.28 (22%)attempts 12–22goals 1–2

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestHornqvist – Lomberg – Luostarinen6:29

    xG 0.58–0.08 (87%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  2. Duclair – Verhaeghe – Barkov8:38

    xG 0.59–0.17 (77%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  3. Reinhart – Marchment – Lundell8:20

    xG 0.53–0.23 (69%)attempts 9–5goals 0–1

  4. Giroux – Huberdeau – Bennett9:59

    xG 0.37–0.21 (64%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMontour – Forsling9:19

    xG 0.74–0.07 (91%)attempts 15–10goals 1–0

  2. Chiarot – Weegar9:16

    xG 0.75–0.11 (87%)attempts 15–4goals 0–0

  3. Lindbohm – Hagg8:22

    xG 0.47–0.10 (82%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 3.7 xGBUF 1.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLABUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 78/100 · #338 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.84 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 80% of the time.

FLA winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).