Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 17, 2022·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

San Jose Sharks 4, Minnesota Wild 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 56% of the time.

MIN winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
SJS162151900430
MIN2111611011528

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:04MINDmitry KulikovAssists: Kevin Fiala, Matt Boldy · Slap, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:29MINJared SpurgeonAssists: Marcus Foligno · Slap, 0.02 xG0–2
  3. P1 9:38SJSRudolfs BalcersAssists: Thomas Bordeleau, Noah Gregor · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:19SJSMatt NietoAssists: Nick Bonino, Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P2 6:37MINMatt BoldyAssists: Kevin Fiala, Frederick Gaudreau · Wrist, 0.23 xG2–3
  6. P2 11:11SJSNoah GregorAssists: Brent Burns, Rudolfs Balcers · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–3
  7. P3 1:37SJSNick BoninoSHAssists: Tomas Hertl, Nicolas Meloche · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–3
  8. P3 8:54MINKevin FialaAssists: Jordie Benn, Frederick Gaudreau · Deflected, 0.10 xG4–4
  9. OT 1:05MINJared SpurgeonGWGAssists: Kevin Fiala, Frederick Gaudreau · Tip-in, 0.06 xG4–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P2 3:12MINNick Bjugstad: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 3:53SJSScott Reedy: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 7:00SJSScott Reedy: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 12:37MINMats Zuccarello: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 16:22SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 17:27MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Holding the stick2 min
  7. P3 0:55SJSTimo Meier: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 14:23SJSTimo Meier: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
48% to win52% to win
← SJS attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hertl won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSMIN
30Shots on goal28
2.3Expected goals2.5
51Shot attempts59
24Faceoffs won32
3Power plays5
10Penalty minutes6
17Hits16
18Blocked shots10
4Giveaways9
7Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestBalcers – Gregor – Bordeleau8:02

    xG 0.46–0.29 (62%)attempts 7–9goals 2–1

  2. Bonino – Couture – Nieto10:49

    xG 0.28–0.28 (50%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0

  3. Hertl – Meier – Dahlen9:39

    xG 0.03–0.28 (9%)attempts 4–9goals 0–1

  4. Chmelevski – Reedy – Weatherby5:27

    xG 0.06–0.47 (12%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBurns – Ferraro17:11

    xG 0.72–0.52 (58%)attempts 19–17goals 3–0

  2. Vlasic – Meloche3:23

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  3. Meloche – Hatakka8:32

    xG 0.22–0.51 (30%)attempts 5–8goals 0–2

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestGaudreau – Fiala – Boldy9:42

    xG 1.00–0.09 (92%)attempts 14–6goals 2–1

  2. Foligno – Bjugstad – Eriksson Ek9:48

    xG 0.34–0.08 (82%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  3. Deslauriers – Duhaime – Dewar7:34

    xG 0.06–0.11 (36%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  4. Zuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov12:20

    xG 0.31–0.73 (30%)attempts 13–13goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGoligoski – Benn12:26

    xG 1.10–0.40 (73%)attempts 17–7goals 2–1

  2. Kulikov – Brodin13:31

    xG 0.37–0.21 (63%)attempts 11–6goals 1–0

  3. Kulikov – Middleton3:24

    xG 0.07–0.02 (82%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.5 xGSJS 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #27 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.89 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 19% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 56% of the time.

MIN winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).