Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 21, 2022·Centre Bell, Montreal

Philadelphia Flyers 6, Montréal Canadiens 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 54% of the time.

MTL winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI2721928634
MTL1911718334

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:43PHIJames van RiemsdykAssists: Bobby Brink · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:29PHIIvan ProvorovAssists: James van Riemsdyk, Bobby Brink · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–0
  3. P1 15:31MTLMike HoffmanAssists: Brendan Gallagher, Christian Dvorak · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–1
  4. P2 5:28MTLJake EvansAssists: Jeff Petry, Rem Pitlick · Tip-in, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P2 6:49PHIOskar LindblomAssists: Zack MacEwen, Linus Hogberg · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P2 13:02PHITravis KonecnyGWGAssists: Ronnie Attard, Ivan Provorov · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–2
  7. P3 15:36PHIMorgan FrostAssists: Noah Cates · Wrist, 0.22 xG5–2
  8. P3 16:56PHIJames van RiemsdykUnassisted · Wrist, 0.06 xG6–2
  9. P3 17:33MTLCole CaufieldAssists: Chris Wideman, Nick Suzuki · Wrist, 0.02 xG6–3
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 9:49MTLKale Clague: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 19:01PHITravis Sanheim: Elbowing2 min
  3. P2 1:36MTLJeff Petry: Interference2 min
  4. P2 18:56MTLBrendan Gallagher: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 18:56PHITravis Konecny: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 11:35MTLRem Pitlick: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MTL
48% to win52% to win
← PHI attackMTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Evans won the faceoff against Thompson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIMTL
34Shots on goal34
3.2Expected goals3.5
58Shot attempts63
24Faceoffs won34
3Power plays1
4Penalty minutes8
22Hits15
18Blocked shots18
4Giveaways21
8Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestvan Riemsdyk – Farabee – Brink9:03

    xG 0.85–0.25 (77%)attempts 10–7goals 2–0

  2. Tippett – Frost – Cates9:22

    xG 0.49–0.29 (63%)attempts 7–10goals 1–1

  3. Thompson – Lindblom – MacEwen9:04

    xG 0.15–0.21 (42%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  4. Hayes – Laughton – Konecny12:16

    xG 0.24–0.77 (24%)attempts 10–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestProvorov – Attard11:26

    xG 0.99–0.29 (77%)attempts 15–11goals 4–0

  2. Sanheim – Zamula4:38

    xG 0.28–0.09 (75%)attempts 6–2goals 1–0

  3. Provorov – Zamula5:48

    xG 0.19–0.07 (74%)attempts 6–2goals 0–1

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestPerreault – Pitlick – Poehling7:06

    xG 0.80–0.16 (83%)attempts 13–7goals 0–1

  2. Anderson – Suzuki – Caufield13:20

    xG 0.46–0.30 (60%)attempts 15–5goals 1–0

  3. Evans – Pitlick – Harvey-Pinard10:27

    xG 0.28–0.51 (35%)attempts 6–12goals 1–1

  4. Hoffman – Gallagher – Dvorak10:22

    xG 0.65–1.10 (37%)attempts 9–16goals 1–3

Defence pairs

  1. bestPetry – Edmundson15:57

    xG 1.25–0.30 (81%)attempts 20–14goals 2–0

  2. Wideman – Clague14:18

    xG 0.31–0.95 (25%)attempts 12–19goals 1–4

  3. Savard – Romanov14:45

    xG 0.29–0.93 (24%)attempts 8–14goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MTL 3.5 xGPHI 3.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MTLPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 77/100 · #362 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.33 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50MTL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 54% of the time.

MTL winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (MTL − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).