Thu, Apr 21, 2022·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh
Boston Bruins 0, Pittsburgh Penguins 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 56% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOS | 011 | 019 | 022 | 052 |
| PIT | 113 | 212 | 17 | 432 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 7:49PITJake GuentzelGWGAssists: Sidney Crosby, Rickard Rakell · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
- P2 6:10PITJason ZuckerAssists: Jeff Carter, John Marino · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–2
- P2 16:12PITJake GuentzelAssists: Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–3
- P3 17:55PITJake GuentzelENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.56 xG0–4
Penalties (3)
- P1 11:48BOSTaylor Hall: Slashing2 min
- P3 7:27PITMarcus Pettersson: Interference2 min
- P3 10:16PITChad Ruhwedel: Holding2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against Crosby
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestBergeron – Marchand – DeBrusk12:42
xG 0.82–0.38 (69%)attempts 20–9goals 0–1
- Coyle – Frederic – McLaughlin3:35
xG 0.24–0.04 (87%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0
- Smith – Coyle – Frederic6:56
xG 0.39–0.25 (61%)attempts 6–7goals 0–2
- Foligno – Lazar – Nosek5:02
xG 0.18–0.13 (58%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestReilly – McAvoy2:16
xG 0.42–0.01 (97%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0
- Forbort – Clifton9:42
xG 0.59–0.22 (72%)attempts 17–8goals 0–0
- Reilly – Clifton2:15
xG 0.10–0.02 (84%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0
Pittsburgh Penguins
Forward lines
- bestCrosby – Rakell – Guentzel13:17
xG 0.87–0.62 (58%)attempts 19–13goals 1–0
- Blueger – McGinn – Heinen11:13
xG 0.26–0.26 (50%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0
- Boyle – Kapanen – Rodrigues8:04
xG 0.22–0.24 (48%)attempts 4–10goals 0–0
- Carter – Zucker – Rust10:04
xG 0.31–0.85 (27%)attempts 4–20goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestMatheson – Ruhwedel13:00
xG 0.58–0.41 (58%)attempts 10–14goals 1–0
- Pettersson – Marino15:15
xG 0.55–0.41 (57%)attempts 14–17goals 1–0
- Letang – Dumoulin17:16
xG 0.56–1.05 (35%)attempts 13–25goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 56% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (PIT − BOS), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).