Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 21, 2022·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Vancouver Canucks 3, Minnesota Wild 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 60% of the time.

MIN winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN01031004324
MIN0839315632

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 4:53MINKevin FialaAssists: Frederick Gaudreau, Matt Boldy · Snap, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P2 5:31VANElias PetterssonAssists: Conor Garland, Brock Boeser · Snap, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:10MINJared SpurgeonAssists: Brandon Duhaime, Jake Middleton · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P2 9:22VANMatthew HighmoreUnassisted · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–2
  5. P2 16:09VANElias PetterssonAssists: Conor Garland, Travis Dermott · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–2
  6. P2 18:36MINMats ZuccarelloAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Jon Merrill · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–3
  7. P3 12:17MINKevin FialaGWGAssists: Jonas Brodin, Frederick Gaudreau · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–4
  8. P3 18:05MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Ryan Hartman, Mats Zuccarello · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–5
  9. P3 18:47MINRyan HartmanENAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Mats Zuccarello · Wrist, 0.74 xG3–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 18:42VANMatthew Highmore: Interference2 min
  2. P1 18:46MINKirill Kaprizov: High sticking double minor4 min
  3. P2 17:01VANLuke Schenn: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 17:01MINNicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min
  5. P3 2:51VANVasily Podkolzin: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P3 8:15VANTyler Myers: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 10:09VANOliver Ekman-Larsson: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 10:09MINRyan Hartman: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
48% to win52% to win
← VAN attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gaudreau won the faceoff against Lammikko
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANMIN
24Shots on goal32
2.7Expected goals3.2
50Shot attempts52
29Faceoffs won21
2Power plays3
13Penalty minutes11
20Hits22
10Blocked shots12
5Giveaways10
4Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestBoeser – Garland – Pettersson9:26

    xG 0.67–0.16 (81%)attempts 15–4goals 2–1

  2. Chiasson – Miller – Podkolzin11:13

    xG 0.79–0.57 (58%)attempts 10–10goals 0–2

  3. Lammikko – Highmore – Lockwood10:33

    xG 0.15–0.13 (53%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  4. Dickinson – Boeser – Pettersson2:00

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHunt – Dermott12:00

    xG 0.99–0.31 (76%)attempts 15–6goals 2–0

  2. Schenn – Hughes13:09

    xG 0.39–0.21 (65%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Dermott – Hughes3:42

    xG 0.17–0.14 (55%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestDuhaime – Dewar – Chaffee5:45

    xG 0.17–0.07 (71%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

  2. Deslauriers – Bjugstad – Eriksson Ek8:20

    xG 0.43–0.51 (46%)attempts 8–11goals 0–1

  3. Gaudreau – Fiala – Boldy12:15

    xG 0.42–0.64 (39%)attempts 9–10goals 2–1

  4. Zuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov14:08

    xG 0.32–0.55 (37%)attempts 9–11goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGoligoski – Brodin15:31

    xG 0.82–0.41 (67%)attempts 15–10goals 1–0

  2. Kulikov – Merrill17:12

    xG 0.38–0.77 (33%)attempts 12–14goals 1–2

  3. Spurgeon – Middleton14:37

    xG 0.38–0.84 (31%)attempts 13–13goals 3–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.2 xGVAN 2.7 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #159 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.15 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 60% of the time.

MIN winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).