Sat, Apr 23, 2022·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose
Chicago Blackhawks 1, San Jose Sharks 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 63% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 09 | 110 | 09 | 128 |
| SJS | 14 | 27 | 18 | 419 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 6:03SJSJasper WeatherbyAssists: Scott Reedy, Sasha Chmelevski · Wrist, 0.24 xG0–1
- P2 1:08SJSTomas HertlGWGAssists: Timo Meier · Slap, 0.09 xG0–2
- P2 10:34SJSTimo MeierAssists: Alexander Barabanov · Backhand, 0.07 xG0–3
- P2 15:38CHITyler JohnsonAssists: Jonathan Toews, Seth Jones · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–3
- P3 6:19SJSNick BoninoPPAssists: Brent Burns, Logan Couture · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–4
Penalties (5)
- P2 11:19CHIHenrik Borgstrom: Holding2 min
- P3 0:55CHIAlec Regula: High sticking2 min
- P3 1:49SJSMario Ferraro: Holding2 min
- P3 5:05CHITyler Johnson: Cross checking2 min · PPG
- P3 9:44SJSRudolfs Balcers: Slashing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Strome won the faceoff against Couture
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Chicago Blackhawks
Forward lines
- bestKane – Strome – DeBrincat13:02
xG 0.48–0.08 (85%)attempts 13–2goals 0–0
- Lafferty – Raddysh – Kurashev9:28
xG 0.63–0.28 (69%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0
- Toews – Johnson – Kubalik11:25
xG 0.46–0.33 (58%)attempts 13–8goals 1–2
- Katchouk – Borgstrom – Johnson4:44
xG 0.08–0.28 (23%)attempts 4–3goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestMcCabe – Regula14:10
xG 0.84–0.46 (65%)attempts 16–10goals 0–1
- Gustafsson – Jones12:53
xG 0.51–0.34 (60%)attempts 14–8goals 0–0
- Gustafsson – Jones5:07
xG 0.13–0.04 (78%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0
San Jose Sharks
Forward lines
- bestChmelevski – Reedy – Weatherby7:04
xG 0.35–0.09 (80%)attempts 5–4goals 1–1
- Hertl – Meier – Barabanov14:23
xG 0.63–0.51 (55%)attempts 10–13goals 2–0
- Bonino – Couture – Nieto10:20
xG 0.09–0.08 (52%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0
- Balcers – Gregor – Bordeleau10:34
xG 0.23–0.75 (23%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestMegna – Meloche13:00
xG 0.28–0.20 (58%)attempts 5–12goals 2–1
- Vlasic – Merkley14:15
xG 0.64–0.92 (41%)attempts 15–15goals 0–0
- Burns – Ferraro19:14
xG 0.16–0.60 (21%)attempts 6–15goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 63% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (SJS − CHI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).