Sun, Apr 24, 2022·Prudential Center, Newark
Detroit Red Wings 3, New Jersey Devils 0
Three stars
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 75% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 17 | 09 | 28 | 324 |
| NJD | 04 | 05 | 08 | 017 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 15:48DETOskar SundqvistGWGAssists: Tyler Bertuzzi · Snap, 0.18 xG1–0
- P3 17:51DETTyler BertuzziENAssists: Oskar Sundqvist, Danny DeKeyser · Wrist, 0.66 xG2–0
- P3 19:47DETMichael RasmussenENAssists: Adam Erne · Backhand, 0.69 xG3–0
Penalties (5)
- P1 9:28NJDMichael McLeod: Cross checking2 min
- P2 5:53DETJakub Vrana: Hooking2 min
- P2 9:00DETJakub Vrana: Tripping2 min
- P3 2:21NJDPavel Zacha: Tripping2 min
- P3 9:48NJDNathan Bastian: Slashing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Boqvist won the faceoff against Veleno
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Detroit Red Wings
Forward lines
- bestGagner – Vrana – Suter6:46
xG 0.35–0.15 (70%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0
- Gagner – Erne – Rasmussen2:17
xG 0.23–0.10 (69%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0
- Vrana – Veleno – Raymond2:17
xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0
- Bertuzzi – Veleno – Raymond7:26
xG 0.10–0.05 (67%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestJuolevi – Seider3:54
xG 0.46–0.06 (89%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0
- DeKeyser – Seider7:51
xG 0.75–0.53 (58%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0
- DeKeyser – Hronek2:06
xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0
New Jersey Devils
Forward lines
- bestBratt – Sharangovich – Mercer7:19
xG 0.80–0.16 (83%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0
- Tatar – Sharangovich – Mercer2:48
xG 0.13–0.11 (53%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0
- Zacha – Kuokkanen – Foote6:58
xG 0.32–0.37 (46%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0
- Tatar – Johnsson – Boqvist6:56
xG 0.10–0.48 (17%)attempts 2–6goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestHamilton – Bahl3:34
xG 0.53–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0
- Subban – Smith5:02
xG 0.72–0.24 (75%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0
- Hamilton – Smith5:55
xG 0.36–0.18 (67%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
NJD's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NJD is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 75% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (NJD − DET), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).