Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 24, 2022·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Minnesota Wild 5, Nashville Predators 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 71% of the time.

NSH winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
MIN1163220812548
NSH19291502425

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:05MINNick BjugstadPPUnassisted · Wrist, 0.28 xG1–0
  2. P1 19:57NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: Dante Fabbro, Mikael Granlund · Wrist, 0.32 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:36MINJoel Eriksson EkAssists: Connor Dewar, Joseph Cramarossa · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–1
  4. P2 10:40NSHMatt DuchenePPAssists: Mikael Granlund, Filip Forsberg · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–2
  5. P2 13:38NSHRyan JohansenPPAssists: Filip Forsberg, Mikael Granlund · Wrist, 0.34 xG2–3
  6. P2 18:27MINJoel Eriksson EkPPAssists: Kevin Fiala, Kirill Kaprizov · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–3
  7. P2 19:37MINKevin FialaAssists: Matt Boldy · Backhand, 0.06 xG4–3
  8. P3 14:20NSHDante FabbroAssists: Matt Duchene, Roman Josi · Deflected, 0.01 xG4–4
  9. OT 4:58MINDmitry KulikovGWGAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek, Kirill Kaprizov · Wrist, 0.11 xG5–4
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 3:15NSHLuke Kunin: Holding2 min
  2. P1 9:48NSHMattias Ekholm: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  3. P1 12:31MINBrandon Duhaime: Interference2 min
  4. P1 17:27MINJoseph Cramarossa: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 6:36NSHDavid Rittich: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P2 6:36NSHPhilip Tomasino: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  7. P2 10:06MINJon Merrill: Interference2 min · PPG
  8. P2 12:42MINNicolas Deslauriers: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  9. P2 14:26NSHColton Sissons: High sticking2 min
  10. P2 18:05NSHAlexandre Carrier: High sticking2 min · PPG
  11. P3 3:20MINNicolas Deslauriers: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 6:22NSHEeli Tolvanen: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
48% to win52% to win
← MIN attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sissons won the faceoff against Gaudreau
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINNSH
48Shots on goal25
5.0Expected goals3.5
79Shot attempts48
38Faceoffs won27
7Power plays5
10Penalty minutes14
36Hits47
10Blocked shots17
5Giveaways10
10Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestGaudreau – Fiala – Boldy9:10

    xG 0.71–0.19 (79%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  2. Cramarossa – Eriksson Ek – Dewar6:14

    xG 0.55–0.11 (83%)attempts 12–4goals 1–1

  3. Deslauriers – Jost – Duhaime6:52

    xG 0.43–0.23 (65%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  4. Bjugstad – Hartman – Kaprizov9:08

    xG 0.44–0.61 (42%)attempts 10–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKulikov – Middleton3:57

    xG 0.45–0.03 (94%)attempts 6–1goals 1–0

  2. Goligoski – Brodin7:07

    xG 0.46–0.06 (88%)attempts 12–4goals 0–1

  3. Merrill – Middleton4:05

    xG 0.20–0.08 (71%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestDuchene – Johansen – Forsberg2:38

    xG 0.36–0.14 (73%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  2. Sissons – Trenin – Jeannot7:41

    xG 0.12–0.10 (54%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Duchene – Granlund – Forsberg10:51

    xG 0.61–0.65 (48%)attempts 8–12goals 1–1

  4. Johansen – Tolvanen – Tomasino6:32

    xG 0.14–0.30 (32%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Josi – Fabbro17:21

    xG 0.99–1.04 (49%)attempts 15–20goals 2–1

  2. Ekholm – Carrier11:06

    xG 0.17–0.39 (30%)attempts 4–10goals 0–0

  3. Borowiecki – Benning10:55

    xG 0.15–0.79 (16%)attempts 6–15goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.5 xGMIN 5.0 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #40 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.97 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 71% of the time.

NSH winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).