Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Apr 26, 2022·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Edmonton Oilers 5, Pittsburgh Penguins 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 72% of the time.

PIT winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM112115315542
PIT07117010134

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:47EDMEvan BouchardAssists: Connor McDavid, Evander Kane · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:23PITJeff CarterAssists: Mike Matheson, Kasperi Kapanen · Wrist, 0.26 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:48EDMEvander KaneGWGAssists: Kailer Yamamoto, Connor McDavid · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P3 4:08EDMZach HymanPPAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Connor McDavid · Wrist, 0.36 xG3–1
  5. P3 9:13EDMConnor McDavidPPAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Tyson Barrie · Wrist, 0.07 xG4–1
  6. P3 18:26EDMZack KassianENAssists: Brett Kulak, Cody Ceci · Wrist, 0.72 xG5–1
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 6:12EDMZack Kassian: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 6:57PITSidney Crosby: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 3:22EDMDerick Brassard: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 10:30PITMarcus Pettersson: Interference2 min
  5. P2 16:18EDMDerek Ryan: Holding the stick2 min
  6. P3 2:58PITMike Matheson: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P3 8:45PITBryan Rust: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 14:06EDMBrett Kulak: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
48% to win52% to win
← EDM attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against McDavid
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMPIT
42Shots on goal34
5.4Expected goals3.8
64Shot attempts59
27Faceoffs won29
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
22Hits25
18Blocked shots12
2Giveaways10
7Takeaways16

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestKane – McDavid – Yamamoto9:25

    xG 1.58–0.06 (96%)attempts 17–5goals 2–0

  2. Brassard – Kassian – Shore7:30

    xG 0.82–0.04 (96%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  3. Nugent-Hopkins – Foegele – Ryan5:31

    xG 0.17–0.08 (68%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  4. Foegele – Ryan – McLeod3:32

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCeci – Kulak17:07

    xG 1.69–0.34 (83%)attempts 21–17goals 0–0

  2. Russell – Barrie11:57

    xG 0.46–0.55 (45%)attempts 9–5goals 0–1

  3. Keith – Bouchard14:22

    xG 0.59–0.91 (39%)attempts 17–20goals 2–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Rakell – McGinn8:57

    xG 0.81–0.19 (81%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

  2. Blueger – McGinn – Rodrigues2:06

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Blueger – Heinen – Rodrigues2:15

    xG 0.03–0.02 (58%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Carter – Zucker – Kapanen3:13

    xG 0.00–0.17 (0%)attempts 1–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestPettersson – Marino10:17

    xG 0.70–0.28 (72%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

  2. Letang – Matheson2:26

    xG 0.16–0.26 (38%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Letang – Dumoulin13:58

    xG 0.49–0.68 (42%)attempts 18–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.8 xGEDM 5.4 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 34/100 · #919 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.14 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 72% of the time.

PIT winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).