Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Apr 27, 2022·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Los Angeles Kings 5, Seattle Kraken 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 54% of the time.

SEA winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
LAK0231729528
SEA112211017340

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:59SEAJared McCannAssists: Yanni Gourde · Slap, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P2 2:24SEARyan DonatoAssists: Jordan Eberle, Carson Soucy · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–2
  3. P2 10:11LAKGabriel VilardiAssists: Blake Lizotte, Jacob Moverare · Slap, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 13:41LAKPhillip DanaultAssists: Viktor Arvidsson, Andreas Athanasiou · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P2 14:29SEAJordan EberleAssists: Matty Beniers, Ryan Donato · Snap, 0.13 xG2–3
  6. P2 17:15LAKTrevor MooreAssists: Matt Roy, Gabriel Vilardi · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. P3 2:39LAKLias AnderssonGWGAssists: Brendan Lemieux · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–3
  8. P3 18:54LAKAndreas AthanasiouENAssists: Gabriel Vilardi, Mikey Anderson · Wrist, 0.78 xG5–3
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 6:30SEAAlexander Wennberg: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 9:26LAKCarl Grundstrom: Interference2 min
  3. P2 18:12LAKMikey Anderson: Holding2 min
  4. P3 11:08LAKGabriel Vilardi: High sticking double minor4 min
  5. P3 13:50LAKPhillip Danault: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
48% to win52% to win
← LAK attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sheahan won the faceoff against Danault
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKSEA
28Shots on goal40
2.9Expected goals3.1
53Shot attempts71
23Faceoffs won33
1Power plays5
10Penalty minutes2
13Hits12
15Blocked shots13
5Giveaways7
8Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestLemieux – Andersson – Kupari6:40

    xG 0.81–0.46 (64%)attempts 9–10goals 1–2

  2. Grundstrom – Kaliyev – Byfield9:52

    xG 0.27–0.29 (48%)attempts 12–9goals 0–1

  3. Athanasiou – Vilardi – Lizotte10:19

    xG 0.45–0.55 (45%)attempts 12–17goals 1–0

  4. Danault – Arvidsson – Moore11:10

    xG 0.04–0.84 (4%)attempts 7–15goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMoverare – Durzi10:47

    xG 1.03–0.29 (78%)attempts 14–11goals 2–1

  2. Roy – Anderson18:08

    xG 0.44–0.93 (32%)attempts 14–26goals 2–2

  3. Bjornfot – Spence15:21

    xG 0.28–1.25 (18%)attempts 15–21goals 0–0

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestRask – Wennberg – Sprong8:57

    xG 0.66–0.20 (77%)attempts 13–6goals 0–1

  2. Sheahan – Donskoi – Geekie12:07

    xG 0.54–0.16 (77%)attempts 15–9goals 0–0

  3. Eberle – Donato – Beniers8:55

    xG 0.39–0.51 (44%)attempts 10–12goals 2–2

  4. Gourde – McCann – Kuhlman6:39

    xG 0.57–0.74 (43%)attempts 12–9goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBorgen – Cholowski13:35

    xG 0.65–0.38 (63%)attempts 21–13goals 1–0

  2. Larsson – Oleksiak16:41

    xG 1.30–1.08 (54%)attempts 24–21goals 1–2

  3. Soucy – Fleury10:14

    xG 0.42–0.24 (63%)attempts 10–8goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 3.1 xGLAK 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEALAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #202 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.02 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 11% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 54% of the time.

SEA winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).