Thu, Apr 28, 2022·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul
Calgary Flames 2, Minnesota Wild 3 (OT)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 55% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGY | 06 | 112 | 115 | 00 | 233 |
| MIN | 010 | 14 | 19 | 12 | 325 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 2:59CGYJohnny GaudreauAssists: Matthew Tkachuk, Nikita Zadorov · Backhand, 0.08 xG1–0
- P2 6:02MINJonas BrodinPPAssists: Frederick Gaudreau, Jordan Greenway · Slap, 0.03 xG1–1
- P3 11:59MINFrederick GaudreauUnassisted · Snap, 0.16 xG1–2
- P3 17:04CGYElias LindholmAssists: Nikita Zadorov, Johnny Gaudreau · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–2
- OT 0:44MINKirill KaprizovPPGWGAssists: Kevin Fiala, Ryan Hartman · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–3
Penalties (6)
- P1 9:39MINJordie Benn: Hooking2 min
- P2 4:09CGYMikael Backlund: Tripping2 min · PPG
- P2 8:16MINAlex Goligoski: Tripping2 min
- P2 12:07MINRyan Hartman: Slashing2 min
- P2 19:50MINJordan Greenway: Interference2 min
- OT 0:34CGYRasmus Andersson: Closing hand on puck2 min · PPG
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Jarnkrok won the faceoff against Hartman
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Calgary Flames
Forward lines
- Gaudreau – Lindholm – Tkachuk12:56
xG 0.36–0.31 (54%)attempts 11–9goals 2–0
- Jarnkrok – Coleman – Dube8:20
xG 0.12–0.23 (34%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0
- Backlund – Toffoli – Mangiapane8:32
xG 0.24–0.40 (37%)attempts 10–10goals 0–1
- Lucic – Ritchie – Carpenter8:59
xG 0.15–0.36 (30%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Tanev – Kylington15:10
xG 0.43–0.48 (48%)attempts 12–13goals 1–0
- Gudbranson – Zadorov14:34
xG 0.29–0.36 (45%)attempts 16–9goals 1–0
- Hanifin – Andersson15:38
xG 0.33–0.41 (44%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0
Minnesota Wild
Forward lines
- bestBjugstad – Hartman – Kaprizov9:17
xG 0.62–0.15 (80%)attempts 14–7goals 0–0
- Gaudreau – Fiala – Boldy9:44
xG 0.46–0.16 (74%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0
- Foligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek11:39
xG 0.24–0.31 (44%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1
- Deslauriers – Jost – Duhaime5:56
xG 0.09–0.27 (25%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestKulikov – Brodin14:45
xG 0.54–0.30 (64%)attempts 14–12goals 1–1
- Goligoski – Middleton18:20
xG 0.47–0.34 (58%)attempts 13–15goals 0–1
- Benn – Merrill13:07
xG 0.32–0.45 (42%)attempts 7–17goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 55% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (MIN − CGY), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).