Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 28, 2022·Rogers Place, Edmonton

San Jose Sharks 4, Edmonton Oilers 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 51% of the time.

EDM winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
SJS21711511200444
EDM0621321012531

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:42SJSNoah GregorAssists: Sasha Chmelevski · Snap, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 3:08SJSNoah GregorAssists: Thomas Bordeleau · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–0
  3. P2 9:17EDMRyan McLeodPPAssists: Kailer Yamamoto, Evan Bouchard · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P2 12:52EDMKailer YamamotoAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Zach Hyman · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P2 15:35SJSScott ReedyPPAssists: Brent Burns, Logan Couture · Tip-in, 0.24 xG3–2
  6. P3 9:37EDMDerek RyanAssists: Tyson Barrie · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. P3 10:40SJSNick BoninoAssists: Logan Couture, Matt Nieto · Snap, 0.14 xG4–3
  8. P3 11:45EDMPhilip BrobergAssists: Connor McDavid, Jesse Puljujarvi · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–4
  9. OT 1:37EDMZach HymanGWGAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Brett Kulak · Snap, 0.13 xG4–5
Penalties (4)
  1. P2 8:07SJSMario Ferraro: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 13:59EDMEvander Kane: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P3 3:33SJSMatt Nieto: Holding2 min
  4. P3 13:10SJSNicolas Meloche: High sticking double minor4 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
48% to win52% to win
← SJS attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bordeleau won the faceoff against Draisaitl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSEDM
44Shots on goal31
5.1Expected goals4.9
78Shot attempts66
34Faceoffs won25
1Power plays4
8Penalty minutes2
18Hits23
16Blocked shots17
10Giveaways16
11Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestBonino – Couture – Nieto9:53

    xG 1.10–0.10 (91%)attempts 15–3goals 1–0

  2. Balcers – Gregor – Bordeleau9:23

    xG 1.07–0.62 (63%)attempts 18–10goals 1–1

  3. Gadjovich – Chmelevski – Reedy8:23

    xG 0.64–0.23 (73%)attempts 14–7goals 0–1

  4. Hertl – Meier – Barabanov13:15

    xG 0.94–0.59 (61%)attempts 17–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMegna – Meloche14:21

    xG 1.57–0.44 (78%)attempts 24–12goals 1–2

  2. Burns – Ferraro19:13

    xG 1.75–0.68 (72%)attempts 26–16goals 2–0

  3. Vlasic – Merkley11:54

    xG 0.58–0.83 (41%)attempts 17–15goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. Brassard – Kassian – McLeod7:29

    xG 0.16–0.44 (27%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

  2. Nugent-Hopkins – Foegele – Ryan9:52

    xG 0.32–0.74 (30%)attempts 10–18goals 1–0

  3. Kane – McDavid – Puljujarvi11:17

    xG 0.76–1.18 (39%)attempts 14–15goals 1–0

  4. Hyman – Draisaitl – Yamamoto12:20

    xG 0.72–1.30 (36%)attempts 8–18goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. Ceci – Kulak17:02

    xG 0.56–0.76 (42%)attempts 16–15goals 0–1

  2. Barrie – Broberg12:51

    xG 0.61–1.56 (28%)attempts 14–21goals 2–1

  3. Keith – Bouchard17:22

    xG 0.44–1.77 (20%)attempts 10–32goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 4.9 xGSJS 5.1 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #26 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.91 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 51% of the time.

EDM winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).