Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Oct 12, 2022·Honda Center, Anaheim

Seattle Kraken 4, Anaheim Ducks 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 81% of the time.

ANA winsSEA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
SEA12021311401448
ANA110182811527

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:51ANATroy TerryAssists: Mason McTavish, Ryan Strome · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:13SEAJared McCannPPAssists: Matty Beniers, Justin Schultz · Snap, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:38SEAAndre BurakovskyPPAssists: Vince Dunn · Snap, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:28SEAOliver BjorkstrandPPAssists: Justin Schultz, Ryan Donato · Snap, 0.20 xG3–1
  5. P2 18:24ANARyan StromePPAssists: Mason McTavish, Trevor Zegras · Tip-in, 0.14 xG3–2
  6. P3 4:09SEAMatty BeniersAssists: Jaden Schwartz, Carson Soucy · Tip-in, 0.13 xG4–2
  7. P3 9:56ANAFrank VatranoAssists: Ryan Strome, John Klingberg · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–3
  8. P3 13:23ANATrevor ZegrasPPAssists: Troy Terry, John Klingberg · Slap, 0.10 xG4–4
  9. OT 0:55ANATroy TerryGWGAssists: John Gibson · Backhand, 0.13 xG4–5
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 7:46ANAMason McTavish: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 9:09ANADmitry Kulikov: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P1 15:08SEAJamie Oleksiak: Interference2 min
  4. P1 19:00ANACam Fowler: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  5. P2 4:45ANAMax Jones: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P2 17:14SEARyan Donato: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 2:10SEAWill Borgen: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 2:10ANAMaxime Comtois: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 12:20SEARyan Donato: Hooking2 min · PPG
  10. P3 15:37ANAJamie Drysdale: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SEA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
49% to win51% to win
← SEA attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Grant won the faceoff against Wennberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SEAANA
48Shots on goal27
4.6Expected goals2.4
78Shot attempts44
24Faceoffs won32
5Power plays3
11Penalty minutes15
22Hits15
12Blocked shots16
6Giveaways10
4Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestEberle – Gourde – Tanev9:36

    xG 0.65–0.04 (94%)attempts 19–4goals 0–0

  2. Schwartz – Bjorkstrand – Wennberg11:39

    xG 0.70–0.28 (72%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  3. Donato – Kuhlman – Wright4:25

    xG 0.62–0.31 (66%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  4. Burakovsky – McCann – Beniers9:40

    xG 0.21–0.12 (64%)attempts 5–2goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLarsson – Dunn17:10

    xG 1.30–0.56 (70%)attempts 24–13goals 0–1

  2. Soucy – Borgen9:11

    xG 0.35–0.07 (83%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  3. Schultz – Oleksiak10:31

    xG 0.42–0.44 (49%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestStrome – Terry – McTavish5:50

    xG 0.33–0.11 (74%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  2. Strome – Vatrano – Terry2:44

    xG 0.07–0.09 (43%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  3. Grant – Jones – Regenda5:52

    xG 0.29–0.41 (41%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  4. Henrique – Vatrano – Zegras7:03

    xG 0.28–0.56 (33%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Fowler – Drysdale2:01

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  2. Fowler – Klingberg19:32

    xG 0.99–1.16 (46%)attempts 19–18goals 1–0

  3. Kulikov – Drysdale14:42

    xG 0.35–0.78 (31%)attempts 9–16goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 2.4 xGSEA 4.6 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANASEA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #66 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.52 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
SEA 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 81% of the time.

ANA winsSEA wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − SEA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).