Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 18, 2022·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Buffalo Sabres 4, Edmonton Oilers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 75% of the time.

EDM winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF1721215424
EDM115010123248

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:00BUFRasmus DahlinPPAssists: Casey Mittelstadt · Snap, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 4:23EDMDarnell NurseAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Cody Ceci · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:44BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Jeff Skinner · Wrist, 0.24 xG2–1
  4. P2 5:15BUFJJ PeterkaGWGAssists: Vinnie Hinostroza · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–1
  5. P3 18:27EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsAssists: Connor McDavid · Snap, 0.17 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:55BUFAlex TuchENAssists: Dylan Cozens · Wrist, 0.79 xG4–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 3:38EDMBrett Kulak: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min · PPG
  2. P1 3:38BUFJeff Skinner: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  3. P1 3:55EDMRyan Nugent-Hopkins: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 5:40BUFPeyton Krebs: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 16:28BUFTage Thompson: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 2:20EDMWarren Foegele: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 2:20BUFIlya Lyubushkin: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 2:20EDMWarren Foegele: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 8:08BUFHenri Jokiharju: Holding the stick2 min
  10. P2 15:59EDMRyan McLeod: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 12:35EDMDarnell Nurse: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
49% to win51% to win
← BUF attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thompson won the faceoff against McDavid
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFEDM
24Shots on goal48
3.4Expected goals5.3
45Shot attempts79
32Faceoffs won40
4Power plays3
10Penalty minutes12
16Hits28
13Blocked shots11
11Giveaways18
12Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. Hinostroza – Cozens – Peterka8:15

    xG 0.12–0.32 (27%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  2. Olofsson – Asplund – Mittelstadt7:55

    xG 0.14–0.44 (24%)attempts 2–10goals 0–0

  3. Okposo – Girgensons – Krebs4:22

    xG 0.09–0.43 (17%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0

  4. Skinner – Tuch – Thompson11:36

    xG 0.88–1.38 (39%)attempts 9–17goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJokiharju – Bryson2:20

    xG 0.10–0.01 (89%)attempts 4–1goals 1–0

  2. Bryson – Power2:33

    xG 0.18–0.12 (60%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Bryson – Lyubushkin4:12

    xG 0.10–0.15 (39%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestHyman – Nugent-Hopkins – Draisaitl3:06

    xG 0.93–0.04 (96%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  2. Kane – Draisaitl – McDavid2:17

    xG 0.39–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 0–0

  3. Foegele – Puljujarvi – McLeod2:26

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  4. Kane – McDavid – Yamamoto10:43

    xG 0.53–0.50 (51%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKulak – Bouchard4:13

    xG 0.65–0.04 (95%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0

  2. Ceci – Nurse14:58

    xG 1.39–0.81 (63%)attempts 22–10goals 0–1

  3. Barrie – Kulak5:34

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 5.3 xGBUF 3.4 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 44/100 · #820 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.20 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 75% of the time.

EDM winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).