Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 25, 2022·United Center, Chicago

Florida Panthers 2, Chicago Blackhawks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 50% of the time.

CHI winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA0709215231
CHI271916422

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:57CHITaylor RaddyshPPAssists: Tyler Johnson, Patrick Kane · Slap, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:37CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Andreas Athanasiou, Max Domi · Snap, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P2 15:58CHIPhilipp KurashevGWGAssists: MacKenzie Entwistle, Caleb Jones · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–3
  4. P3 11:32FLAEetu LuostarinenAssists: Colin White, Anton Lundell · Wrist, 0.22 xG1–3
  5. P3 12:47FLAMatthew TkachukAssists: Brandon Montour, Carter Verhaeghe · Deflected, 0.07 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:37CHIJonathan ToewsENAssists: Jason Dickinson · Wrap-around, 0.79 xG2–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 2:20FLAColin White: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  2. P2 2:11CHIJake McCabe: High sticking double minor4 min
  3. P2 6:20CHISam Lafferty: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 9:35CHITyler Johnson: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 10:00CHIJason Dickinson: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 13:54FLAMatthew Tkachuk: Holding the stick2 min
  7. P2 17:34FLARadko Gudas: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 17:34CHIMax Domi: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  9. P3 13:07CHIMax Domi: Delaying game face off violation2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
49% to win51% to win
← FLA attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dickinson won the faceoff against Barkov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLACHI
31Shots on goal22
2.9Expected goals2.9
71Shot attempts34
25Faceoffs won35
6Power plays2
6Penalty minutes14
17Hits29
6Blocked shots20
9Giveaways10
5Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestWhite – Luostarinen – Lundell6:57

    xG 0.66–0.17 (80%)attempts 8–1goals 1–0

  2. Verhaeghe – Barkov – Tkachuk3:15

    xG 0.39–0.04 (90%)attempts 9–1goals 1–0

  3. Bennett – Balcers – Tkachuk5:04

    xG 0.27–0.09 (75%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. White – Lomberg – Luostarinen2:25

    xG 0.09–0.00 (99%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStaal – Kiersted8:08

    xG 0.83–0.15 (85%)attempts 11–5goals 1–0

  2. Gudas – Mahura6:20

    xG 0.21–0.03 (88%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Montour – Forsling8:12

    xG 0.26–0.13 (67%)attempts 9–3goals 1–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestDickinson – Lafferty – Kurashev9:59

    xG 0.28–0.20 (59%)attempts 8–10goals 0–1

  2. Kane – Athanasiou – Domi10:02

    xG 0.38–0.55 (41%)attempts 6–12goals 1–0

  3. Toews – Johnson – Raddysh5:49

    xG 0.05–0.27 (15%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  4. Blackwell – Khaira – Entwistle6:17

    xG 0.05–0.36 (12%)attempts 3–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcCabe – Jones8:54

    xG 0.41–0.10 (80%)attempts 6–9goals 1–0

  2. Johnson – Jones10:17

    xG 0.32–0.42 (43%)attempts 6–10goals 0–2

  3. McCabe – Jones2:44

    xG 0.00–0.26 (2%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 2.9 xGFLA 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 63/100 · #535 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.94 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 50% of the time.

CHI winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).