Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 25, 2022·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Buffalo Sabres 1, Seattle Kraken 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 76% of the time.

SEA winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF051506116
SEA2112815524

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:20SEAJamie OleksiakAssists: Daniel Sprong, Yanni Gourde · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:39SEAMorgan GeekieGWGAssists: Brandon Tanev, Vince Dunn · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P2 4:46SEADaniel SprongAssists: Brandon Tanev · Wrist, 0.22 xG0–3
  4. P2 12:25BUFDylan CozensAssists: Vinnie Hinostroza, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–3
  5. P2 16:07SEAJared McCannPPAssists: Andre Burakovsky, Vince Dunn · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–4
  6. P3 9:45SEAMatty BeniersPPAssists: Justin Schultz, Daniel Sprong · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 11:13BUFRasmus Dahlin: Closing hand on puck2 min
  2. P1 16:15SEAAdam Larsson: Cross checking2 min
  3. P2 14:54BUFKyle Okposo: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 17:39SEADaniel Sprong: Holding the stick2 min
  5. P3 3:20SEAMorgan Geekie: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 4:47SEAWill Borgen: Holding2 min
  7. P3 8:05BUFTage Thompson: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
49% to win51% to win
← BUF attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thompson won the faceoff against Wennberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFSEA
16Shots on goal24
1.6Expected goals3.1
41Shot attempts41
33Faceoffs won16
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
12Hits15
7Blocked shots17
7Giveaways8
5Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. Okposo – Girgensons – Quinn7:38

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  2. Skinner – Tuch – Thompson9:00

    xG 0.26–0.45 (36%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  3. Hinostroza – Cozens – Peterka9:29

    xG 0.29–0.53 (35%)attempts 9–7goals 0–2

  4. Olofsson – Asplund – Mittelstadt9:40

    xG 0.33–0.96 (26%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDahlin – Power9:28

    xG 0.36–0.12 (75%)attempts 12–4goals 1–0

  2. Dahlin – Lyubushkin7:48

    xG 0.17–0.05 (78%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Bryson – Power9:11

    xG 0.39–0.61 (39%)attempts 7–9goals 0–2

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestBjorkstrand – Burakovsky – Wennberg9:44

    xG 1.07–0.33 (76%)attempts 11–9goals 0–1

  2. Sprong – Tanev – Geekie5:55

    xG 0.69–0.06 (92%)attempts 6–4goals 3–0

  3. Eberle – Schwartz – Beniers10:06

    xG 0.54–0.12 (81%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  4. Gourde – McCann – Kuhlman7:56

    xG 0.04–0.12 (24%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLarsson – Dunn11:10

    xG 1.40–0.21 (87%)attempts 13–8goals 2–0

  2. Soucy – Borgen12:06

    xG 0.68–0.36 (65%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

  3. Schultz – Oleksiak12:06

    xG 0.25–0.27 (48%)attempts 4–10goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 3.1 xGBUF 1.6 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEABUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 24/100 · #1078 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.72 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 76% of the time.

SEA winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).