Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 29, 2022·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Carolina Hurricanes 4, Philadelphia Flyers 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 61% of the time.

PHI winsCAR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CAR2120111916438
PHI092811002329

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:27CARJordan StaalAssists: Brett Pesce, Brady Skjei · Backhand, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:04CARJordan MartinookAssists: Jesper Fast, Jordan Staal · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–0
  3. P2 5:14PHINicolas DeslauriersAssists: Lukas Sedlak, Wade Allison · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P2 7:18PHIOwen TippettPPAssists: Travis Konecny, Tony DeAngelo · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P3 6:09PHIWade AllisonAssists: Lukas Sedlak, Nicolas Deslauriers · Backhand, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P3 17:55CARMartin NecasUnassisted · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–3
  7. OT 4:06CARBrent BurnsGWGAssists: Sebastian Aho, Martin Necas · Slap, 0.08 xG4–3
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 2:50PHILukas Sedlak: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 8:44CARAndrei Svechnikov: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 12:04PHIRasmus Ristolainen: Interference2 min
  4. P1 17:05PHITony DeAngelo: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P1 17:05PHITravis Sanheim: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P1 17:05CARBrent Burns: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P2 2:09CARPaul Stastny: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  8. P2 6:08CARBrent Burns: Tripping2 min · PPG
  9. P2 9:02PHIScott Laughton: Slashing2 min
  10. P2 12:56CARJesperi Kotkaniemi: Slashing2 min
  11. P2 16:18CARSebastian Aho: Cross checking2 min
  12. P3 15:07CARJesperi Kotkaniemi: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CAR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
49% to win51% to win
← CAR attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Laughton
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CARPHI
38Shots on goal29
3.8Expected goals3.0
74Shot attempts47
32Faceoffs won34
4Power plays6
14Penalty minutes10
28Hits27
10Blocked shots17
8Giveaways7
8Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Fast – Martinook12:01

    xG 0.85–0.07 (93%)attempts 19–2goals 2–0

  2. Aho – Necas – Svechnikov6:12

    xG 0.40–0.20 (66%)attempts 10–6goals 1–0

  3. Stastny – Stepan – Noesen2:34

    xG 0.30–0.15 (66%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  4. Teravainen – Aho – Jarvis2:40

    xG 0.11–0.01 (95%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSlavin – Chatfield3:05

    xG 0.70–0.01 (99%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Skjei – Pesce14:29

    xG 0.62–0.20 (76%)attempts 15–8goals 2–0

  3. Burns – Slavin14:06

    xG 0.34–0.60 (36%)attempts 15–10goals 1–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestDeslauriers – Sedlak – Allison4:29

    xG 0.91–0.42 (68%)attempts 9–6goals 2–0

  2. Laughton – Tippett – Cates8:46

    xG 0.05–0.16 (24%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Bellows – MacEwen – Frost6:19

    xG 0.27–0.43 (38%)attempts 6–13goals 0–0

  4. Hayes – Konecny – Farabee7:41

    xG 0.16–0.35 (32%)attempts 6–6goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestDeAngelo – Provorov11:40

    xG 0.79–0.23 (77%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  2. Braun – Sanheim3:47

    xG 0.19–0.14 (57%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Braun – Seeler4:09

    xG 0.29–0.35 (45%)attempts 5–9goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.0 xGCAR 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHICAR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #106 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.57 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 9% (winner's lowest chance)
CAR 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 61% of the time.

PHI winsCAR wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − CAR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).