Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 29, 2022·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Chicago Blackhawks 3, Buffalo Sabres 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 70% of the time.

BUF winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CHI162170300326
BUF11601521311445

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:19BUFVictor OlofssonPPAssists: Casey Mittelstadt · Slap, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:20CHIJason DickinsonPPAssists: MacKenzie Entwistle, Caleb Jones · Backhand, 0.23 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:49CHISam LaffertyAssists: Jake McCabe, Seth Jones · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:20CHITaylor RaddyshAssists: Philipp Kurashev, Jonathan Toews · Backhand, 0.11 xG3–1
  5. P3 11:55BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Kyle Okposo, Jeff Skinner · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–2
  6. P3 16:47BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Jeff Skinner, Kyle Okposo · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–3
  7. OT 0:36BUFVictor OlofssonPPGWGAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Tage Thompson · Slap, 0.11 xG3–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 2:53CHIPhilipp Kurashev: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 5:51CHIConnor Murphy: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 8:48BUFPeyton Krebs: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 10:20BUFVictor Olofsson: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  5. P2 19:56BUFVictor Olofsson: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P3 13:12BUFRasmus Dahlin: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 18:53CHIJonathan Toews: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
49% to win51% to win
← CHI attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Domi won the faceoff against Cozens
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIBUF
26Shots on goal45
3.0Expected goals4.4
47Shot attempts78
37Faceoffs won14
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
11Hits7
23Blocked shots12
4Giveaways6
10Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestToews – Raddysh – Kurashev9:02

    xG 0.77–0.15 (84%)attempts 10–3goals 1–0

  2. Katchouk – Entwistle – Johnson7:05

    xG 0.38–0.28 (57%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  3. Blackwell – Dickinson – Lafferty9:55

    xG 0.47–0.72 (39%)attempts 7–17goals 1–0

  4. Kane – Athanasiou – Domi11:47

    xG 0.31–0.92 (25%)attempts 8–21goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Tinordi – Murphy14:25

    xG 0.68–0.69 (50%)attempts 10–16goals 1–0

  2. McCabe – Jones14:48

    xG 0.92–1.02 (47%)attempts 15–28goals 1–1

  3. Johnson – Jones13:48

    xG 0.47–0.86 (35%)attempts 11–14goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOlofsson – Mittelstadt – Quinn8:23

    xG 0.80–0.01 (99%)attempts 16–1goals 0–0

  2. Okposo – Skinner – Thompson4:04

    xG 0.56–0.06 (91%)attempts 12–1goals 2–0

  3. Tuch – Cozens – Peterka4:33

    xG 0.13–0.04 (76%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Hinostroza – Cozens – Peterka6:21

    xG 0.24–0.24 (50%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClague – Bryson2:13

    xG 0.49–0.04 (93%)attempts 8–1goals 1–0

  2. Dahlin – Pilut2:29

    xG 0.44–0.07 (86%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Clague – Power11:10

    xG 0.63–0.30 (67%)attempts 16–8goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 4.4 xGCHI 3.0 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #164 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.29 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 4% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 70% of the time.

BUF winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).