Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Oct 30, 2022·Honda Center, Anaheim

Toronto Maple Leafs 3, Anaheim Ducks 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 72% of the time.

ANA winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
TOR2170711002336
ANA1901421214439

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:23TORAuston MatthewsPPAssists: William Nylander, Mitch Marner · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:23ANAJakob SilfverbergAssists: Derek Grant, Isac Lundeström · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P1 17:50TORDenis MalginAssists: William Nylander, Nick Robertson · Backhand, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P3 0:45TORCalle JarnkrokSHAssists: Alexander Kerfoot, TJ Brodie · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–1
  5. P3 7:24ANATrevor ZegrasAssists: Troy Terry · Backhand, 0.11 xG3–2
  6. P3 13:01ANADmitry KulikovAssists: Frank Vatrano, Kevin Shattenkirk · Wrap-around, 0.10 xG3–3
  7. OT 2:15ANATrevor ZegrasGWGAssists: Ryan Strome · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 3:40ANAAdam Henrique: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 13:45ANAKevin Shattenkirk: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 13:45TORMichael Bunting: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 0:20ANAJohn Klingberg: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 9:05TORFilip Kral: Holding2 min
  6. P2 19:56TORAuston Matthews: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 6:27ANACam Fowler: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
49% to win51% to win
← TOR attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Matthews won the faceoff against Lundeström
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORANA
36Shots on goal39
5.0Expected goals3.3
57Shot attempts63
28Faceoffs won29
2Power plays2
6Penalty minutes6
9Hits18
12Blocked shots9
6Giveaways7
8Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestEngvall – Aston-Reese – Kampf9:01

    xG 0.88–0.37 (70%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  2. Bunting – Marner – Matthews13:48

    xG 0.97–0.62 (61%)attempts 13–10goals 0–2

  3. Tavares – Jarnkrok – Kerfoot8:42

    xG 0.45–0.47 (49%)attempts 6–13goals 0–1

  4. Nylander – Malgin – Robertson6:00

    xG 0.27–0.30 (48%)attempts 4–6goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGiordano – Holl4:15

    xG 0.41–0.05 (89%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  2. Giordano – Sandin2:29

    xG 0.35–0.02 (94%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Rielly – Sandin12:58

    xG 0.90–0.69 (57%)attempts 11–15goals 1–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGrant – Silfverberg – Lundeström7:10

    xG 0.31–0.13 (71%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  2. Jones – Comtois – Lundeström2:21

    xG 0.00–0.19 (0%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Henrique – Vatrano – Zegras8:09

    xG 0.37–0.56 (40%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  4. Strome – Terry – Comtois2:58

    xG 0.04–0.32 (10%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Kulikov – Klingberg17:48

    xG 1.24–1.21 (51%)attempts 17–14goals 1–0

  2. Fowler – Benoit12:26

    xG 0.33–0.41 (45%)attempts 15–12goals 0–1

  3. Shattenkirk – White5:43

    xG 0.01–0.15 (6%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.3 xGTOR 5.0 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANATOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 83/100 · #285 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.01 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 7% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 72% of the time.

ANA winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).