Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 31, 2022·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Detroit Red Wings 3, Buffalo Sabres 8

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 83% of the time.

BUF winsDET wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DET062913318
BUF114315417846

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:52BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Jeff Skinner, Casey Fitzgerald · Slap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:26DETOlli MaattaAssists: Andrew Copp, Filip Hronek · Slap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:22BUFJack QuinnAssists: Tage Thompson, Kyle Okposo · Snap, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P2 14:26BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Tage Thompson · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–3
  5. P2 18:30BUFTage ThompsonPPGWGAssists: Alex Tuch, Kyle Okposo · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–4
  6. P2 19:03DETDavid PerronAssists: Joseph Veleno, Moritz Seider · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–4
  7. P3 4:19DETDylan LarkinSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–4
  8. P3 12:53BUFRasmus DahlinPPAssists: Casey Mittelstadt, Tage Thompson · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–5
  9. P3 14:47BUFDylan CozensAssists: Owen Power, JJ Peterka · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–6
  10. P3 15:58BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Jeff Skinner, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–7
  11. P3 19:21BUFRasmus AsplundAssists: Peyton Krebs, Zemgus Girgensons · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–8
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 17:09DETDavid Perron: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 17:55BUFRasmus Dahlin: Interference2 min
  3. P2 16:01DETGustav Lindstrom: Holding the stick2 min
  4. P2 17:00DETBen Chiarot: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  5. P3 2:38DETAlex Nedeljkovic: Interference2 min
  6. P3 9:51BUFCasey Fitzgerald: Cross checking2 min
  7. P3 9:51DETDylan Larkin: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P3 11:06DETJoseph Veleno: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DET00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
49% to win51% to win
← DET attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cozens won the faceoff against Larkin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DETBUF
18Shots on goal46
1.5Expected goals3.5
33Shot attempts73
33Faceoffs won32
1Power plays5
12Penalty minutes4
20Hits11
12Blocked shots5
3Giveaways2
9Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestPerron – Veleno – Raymond2:56

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 1–0

  2. Erne – Larkin – Raymond9:30

    xG 0.40–0.39 (51%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

  3. Smith – Suter – Soderblom9:08

    xG 0.32–0.36 (47%)attempts 7–14goals 0–2

  4. Perron – Kubalik – Copp8:08

    xG 0.16–0.68 (19%)attempts 3–19goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Maatta – Hronek17:48

    xG 0.32–0.59 (36%)attempts 6–16goals 1–1

  2. Chiarot – Seider15:37

    xG 0.78–1.11 (41%)attempts 12–23goals 1–1

  3. Hagg – Lindstrom13:52

    xG 0.12–0.87 (12%)attempts 8–20goals 0–3

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOkposo – Skinner – Thompson9:52

    xG 0.82–0.38 (69%)attempts 18–9goals 2–1

  2. Girgensons – Asplund – Krebs11:03

    xG 0.44–0.00 (100%)attempts 13–0goals 1–0

  3. Olofsson – Mittelstadt – Quinn9:32

    xG 0.47–0.33 (58%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  4. Tuch – Cozens – Peterka11:40

    xG 0.52–0.41 (56%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClague – Power11:06

    xG 1.02–0.18 (85%)attempts 19–4goals 1–1

  2. Fitzgerald – Pilut14:47

    xG 0.45–0.31 (60%)attempts 16–9goals 1–0

  3. Bryson – Dahlin15:08

    xG 0.40–0.49 (45%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.5 xGDET 1.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFDET

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #299 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.42 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
DET 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 83% of the time.

BUF winsDET wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − DET), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).