Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 5, 2022·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Anaheim Ducks 5, San Jose Sharks 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 81% of the time.

SJS winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
ANA2406211043525
SJS121213113052452

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:54SJSKevin LabancAssists: Timo Meier, Matt Benning · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:06ANABrett LeasonAssists: John Klingberg, Mason McTavish · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P1 17:20ANAMaxime ComtoisAssists: Trevor Zegras, Brett Leason · Snap, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P2 8:09SJSTimo MeierAssists: Erik Karlsson, Tomas Hertl · Slap, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P2 16:35SJSLuke KuninPPAssists: Tomas Hertl, Kevin Labanc · Tip-in, 0.15 xG2–3
  6. P3 9:33SJSTomas HertlAssists: Timo Meier · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–4
  7. P3 15:58ANAMason McTavishAssists: Dmitry Kulikov · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–4
  8. P3 18:32ANAAdam HenriqueAssists: Troy Terry, Trevor Zegras · Wrist, 0.28 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. SJS Logan Couture stopped
  2. 2. ANA Trevor Zegras scored
  3. 3. SJS Kevin Labanc scored
  4. 4. ANA Troy Terry stopped
  5. 5. SJS Nick Bonino scored
  6. 6. ANA Mason McTavish scored
  7. 7. SJS Erik Karlsson stopped
  8. 8. ANA Maxime Comtois stopped
  9. 9. SJS Timo Meier stopped
  10. 10. ANA Adam Henrique scored
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 4:49SJSJonah Gadjovich: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 4:49ANANathan Beaulieu: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 14:02ANAMax Jones: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P1 19:43ANAKevin Shattenkirk: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 15:15ANASimon Benoit: Roughing2 min · PPG
  6. P2 15:15ANAFrank Vatrano: Closing hand on puck2 min
  7. P2 15:15SJSTimo Meier: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 16:35ANATrevor Zegras: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  9. P3 3:09ANASimon Benoit: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 3:09SJSJonah Gadjovich: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 13:51ANAMason McTavish: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
49% to win51% to win
← ANA attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hertl won the faceoff against Lundeström
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANASJS
25Shots on goal52
2.8Expected goals5.0
48Shot attempts84
27Faceoffs won34
0Power plays5
19Penalty minutes9
15Hits25
19Blocked shots10
7Giveaways10
14Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestJones – Leason – McTavish6:47

    xG 0.58–0.40 (59%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  2. Strome – Terry – Zegras4:20

    xG 0.16–0.27 (38%)attempts 6–4goals 0–1

  3. Silfverberg – Jones – Lundeström2:15

    xG 0.00–0.29 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–1

  4. Henrique – Vatrano – Zegras6:30

    xG 0.04–0.52 (7%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Beaulieu6:38

    xG 0.53–0.47 (53%)attempts 12–12goals 0–1

  2. Fowler – Klingberg3:50

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Shattenkirk – White3:47

    xG 0.12–0.13 (49%)attempts 1–1goals 1–1

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestHertl – Labanc – Meier9:40

    xG 0.95–0.22 (81%)attempts 18–4goals 3–1

  2. Couture – Nieto – Barabanov9:58

    xG 0.69–0.20 (77%)attempts 12–7goals 0–1

  3. Lindblom – Lorentz – Gadjovich6:11

    xG 0.56–0.17 (77%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

  4. Bonino – Kunin – Sturm8:33

    xG 0.44–0.40 (52%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Benning12:23

    xG 1.10–0.25 (81%)attempts 15–7goals 1–1

  2. Karlsson – Megna15:50

    xG 0.83–0.44 (66%)attempts 20–8goals 1–1

  3. Ferraro – Simek12:01

    xG 0.50–0.59 (46%)attempts 13–15goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 5.0 xGANA 2.8 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #80 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.59 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 2% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 81% of the time.

SJS winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).