Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 10, 2022·Ball Arena, Denver

Nashville Predators 3, Colorado Avalanche 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 64% of the time.

COL winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH11411219335
COL12141103535

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:45NSHEeli TolvanenAssists: Ryan McDonagh, Cody Glass · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:37COLMikko RantanenPPAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Artturi Lehkonen · Snap, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:34COLLogan O'ConnorAssists: Devon Toews, J.T. Compher · Tip-in, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:59COLLogan O'ConnorAssists: J.T. Compher · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–3
  5. P2 10:48COLMikko RantanenGWGAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Kurtis MacDermid · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–4
  6. P2 15:12COLEvan RodriguesPPAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Cale Makar · Snap, 0.11 xG1–5
  7. P2 19:32NSHRyan JohansenPPAssists: Mikael Granlund, Filip Forsberg · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–5
  8. P3 2:59NSHRoman JosiAssists: Dante Fabbro, Yakov Trenin · Slap, 0.02 xG3–5
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 6:29NSHRyan McDonagh: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 18:53NSHFilip Forsberg: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 8:40COLMikko Rantanen: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 14:32NSHJeremy Lauzon: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P2 19:05COLArtturi Lehkonen: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
49% to win51% to win
← NSH attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Granlund won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHCOL
35Shots on goal35
2.1Expected goals3.0
63Shot attempts61
38Faceoffs won31
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
32Hits23
12Blocked shots21
3Giveaways8
4Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestJankowski – Trenin – Jeannot9:25

    xG 0.76–0.26 (75%)attempts 14–8goals 1–0

  2. Johansen – Niederreiter – Sissons12:02

    xG 0.53–0.32 (62%)attempts 15–11goals 0–0

  3. Glass – Tolvanen – Smith5:58

    xG 0.10–0.15 (40%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  4. Duchene – Granlund – Forsberg13:40

    xG 0.21–0.82 (20%)attempts 13–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Carrier14:45

    xG 0.80–0.32 (71%)attempts 18–10goals 0–0

  2. Josi – Fabbro15:14

    xG 0.36–0.57 (39%)attempts 13–13goals 1–0

  3. McDonagh – Lauzon12:57

    xG 0.38–0.80 (32%)attempts 11–15goals 1–2

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestCogliano – Compher – O'Connor11:31

    xG 0.37–0.08 (82%)attempts 8–11goals 2–0

  2. Rodrigues – Kaut – Newhook4:52

    xG 0.20–0.01 (95%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Lehkonen – MacKinnon – Rantanen11:40

    xG 0.58–0.63 (48%)attempts 12–17goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Makar17:15

    xG 0.90–0.50 (64%)attempts 17–22goals 1–0

  2. Manson – MacDonald10:24

    xG 0.52–0.34 (61%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Toews3:03

    xG 0.06–0.16 (28%)attempts 1–5goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.0 xGNSH 2.1 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #472 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.09 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 37% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 64% of the time.

COL winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).