Fri, Nov 11, 2022·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle
Minnesota Wild 1, Seattle Kraken 0
Three stars
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 61% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIN | 18 | 07 | 06 | 121 |
| SEA | 06 | 08 | 014 | 028 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 18:19MINMats ZuccarelloGWGAssists: Jon Merrill, Kirill Kaprizov · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
Penalties (7)
- P1 1:20MINJared Spurgeon: Tripping2 min
- P1 10:12SEAVince Dunn: Hooking2 min
- P1 14:34MINCalen Addison: Hooking2 min
- P1 0:00MINMathew Dumba: High sticking2 min
- P2 11:55SEAJustin Schultz: Hooking2 min
- P2 15:11SEAAndre Burakovsky: Hooking2 min
- P3 0:21MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Interference2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Gourde won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Minnesota Wild
Forward lines
- bestCramarossa – Steel – Beckman4:42
xG 0.27–0.10 (73%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0
- Zuccarello – Gaudreau – Kaprizov9:22
xG 0.46–0.32 (59%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0
- Shaw – Dewar – Rossi7:50
xG 0.48–0.43 (53%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0
- Zuccarello – Kaprizov – Boldy2:32
xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestDumba – Middleton3:40
xG 0.20–0.09 (69%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Merrill – Addison10:23
xG 0.43–0.46 (48%)attempts 7–12goals 1–0
- Spurgeon – Middleton11:49
xG 0.38–0.47 (45%)attempts 7–16goals 0–0
Seattle Kraken
Forward lines
- bestGourde – McCann – Tanev7:08
xG 0.31–0.01 (96%)attempts 13–2goals 0–0
- Eberle – Schwartz – Beniers9:03
xG 0.40–0.21 (66%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0
- Gourde – Donato – Tanev2:58
xG 0.01–0.10 (13%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Donato – Sprong – Geekie2:56
xG 0.12–0.23 (35%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestLarsson – Dunn15:26
xG 0.56–0.28 (67%)attempts 17–9goals 0–1
- Schultz – Soucy4:25
xG 0.42–0.29 (59%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0
- Borgen – Fleury2:02
xG 0.03–0.01 (71%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 61% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (SEA − MIN), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).