Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Nov 14, 2022·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Los Angeles Kings 5, Calgary Flames 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 69% of the time.

CGY winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
LAK21314212529
CGY4921704630

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:49CGYJonathan HuberdeauAssists: Rasmus Andersson, Noah Hanifin · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:53LAKArthur KaliyevPPAssists: Viktor Arvidsson, Trevor Moore · Snap, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P1 6:11LAKArthur KaliyevAssists: Blake Lizotte, Matt Roy · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P1 10:55CGYAndrew MangiapaneAssists: Milan Lucic, Nazem Kadri · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P1 11:37CGYBrett RitchieAssists: Blake Coleman · Tip-in, 0.14 xG2–3
  6. P1 16:25CGYTyler ToffoliAssists: Elias Lindholm, Adam Ruzicka · Snap, 0.11 xG2–4
  7. P2 1:51CGYElias LindholmPPAssists: Tyler Toffoli, Nazem Kadri · Wrist, 0.21 xG2–5
  8. P2 14:26LAKKevin FialaAssists: Alexander Edler, Rasmus Kupari · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–5
  9. P2 16:36CGYAdam RuzickaGWGAssists: Elias Lindholm, Tyler Toffoli · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–6
  10. P3 8:57LAKAnze KopitarAssists: Drew Doughty, Sean Walker · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–6
  11. P3 18:41LAKAdrian KempeAssists: Drew Doughty, Kevin Fiala · Slap, 0.08 xG5–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 4:23CGYNazem Kadri: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 0:53LAKViktor Arvidsson: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  3. P2 7:49LAKMatt Roy: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P3 8:17LAKPhillip Danault: Roughing2 min
  5. P3 8:17CGYNikita Zadorov: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 10:14CGYNoah Hanifin: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 18:16CGYJonathan Huberdeau: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 18:16LAKPhillip Danault: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
49% to win51% to win
← LAK attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Danault won the faceoff against Lindholm
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKCGY
29Shots on goal30
2.3Expected goals3.4
52Shot attempts56
34Faceoffs won33
2Power plays2
8Penalty minutes8
24Hits22
17Blocked shots12
12Giveaways14
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. Arvidsson – Vilardi – Kupari2:46

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  2. Anderson-Dolan – Lizotte – Kaliyev7:16

    xG 0.36–0.38 (49%)attempts 9–7goals 1–1

  3. Danault – Fiala – Moore3:38

    xG 0.05–0.12 (30%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Danault – Arvidsson – Moore9:52

    xG 0.34–0.53 (39%)attempts 5–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Roy – Durzi13:23

    xG 0.42–0.42 (50%)attempts 10–11goals 1–3

  2. Doughty – Anderson16:26

    xG 0.40–0.52 (43%)attempts 13–11goals 0–0

  3. Doughty – Durzi2:01

    xG 0.00–0.36 (0%)attempts 1–4goals 0–1

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestColeman – Ritchie – Dube11:01

    xG 0.48–0.14 (78%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  2. Toffoli – Lindholm – Ruzicka10:20

    xG 0.85–0.54 (61%)attempts 11–9goals 2–1

  3. Lucic – Kadri – Mangiapane9:43

    xG 0.34–0.21 (63%)attempts 8–9goals 1–1

  4. Lewis – Backlund – Huberdeau11:40

    xG 0.28–0.17 (62%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTanev – Weegar9:28

    xG 1.04–0.02 (98%)attempts 15–3goals 2–0

  2. Tanev – Zadorov5:16

    xG 0.40–0.05 (89%)attempts 7–1goals 1–0

  3. Tanev – Hanifin2:52

    xG 0.25–0.01 (95%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.4 xGLAK 2.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #208 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.49 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 36% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 69% of the time.

CGY winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).