Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 15, 2022·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Philadelphia Flyers 4, Columbus Blue Jackets 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 61% of the time.

CBJ winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PHI0721621301437
CBJ191921312533

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:36CBJSean KuralyAssists: Vladislav Gavrikov, Eric Robinson · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P2 5:36CBJBoone JennerPPAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, Kent Johnson · Tip-in, 0.17 xG0–2
  3. P2 8:54PHIKevin HayesAssists: Travis Konecny, Scott Laughton · Slap, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P2 12:16PHINoah CatesAssists: Zack MacEwen, Owen Tippett · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P3 3:22CBJBoone JennerUnassisted · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–3
  6. P3 3:35CBJEric RobinsonAssists: Mathieu Olivier, Marcus Bjork · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–4
  7. P3 4:58PHINick SeelerAssists: Morgan Frost, Joel Farabee · Slap, 0.06 xG3–4
  8. P3 9:14PHITravis KonecnyPPAssists: Noah Cates, Kevin Hayes · Wrist, 0.25 xG4–4
  9. OT 3:14CBJVladislav GavrikovGWGAssists: Egor Chinakhov, Cole Sillinger · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–5
Penalties (5)
  1. P2 3:09CBJErik Gudbranson: Interference2 min
  2. P2 4:27PHIOwen Tippett: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P3 5:29CBJSean Kuraly: Roughing2 min
  4. P3 5:29PHIKevin Hayes: Roughing2 min
  5. P3 8:41CBJBrendan Gaunce: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
49% to win51% to win
← PHI attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hayes won the faceoff against Jenner
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHICBJ
37Shots on goal33
2.6Expected goals3.3
77Shot attempts57
29Faceoffs won32
2Power plays1
4Penalty minutes6
27Hits34
18Blocked shots25
0Giveaways7
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestHayes – Laughton – Konecny7:02

    xG 0.50–0.18 (74%)attempts 11–2goals 1–1

  2. Willman – MacEwen – Frost3:28

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Willman – Frost – Farabee7:34

    xG 0.51–0.67 (43%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0

  4. Hayes – Konecny – Tippett5:23

    xG 0.00–0.17 (0%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBraun – Seeler4:47

    xG 0.41–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–2goals 1–0

  2. Ristolainen – Sanheim7:07

    xG 0.36–0.42 (46%)attempts 10–7goals 1–2

  3. Seeler – Ristolainen6:42

    xG 0.19–0.28 (40%)attempts 2–10goals 1–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestKuraly – Olivier – Robinson12:04

    xG 1.04–0.50 (68%)attempts 8–18goals 1–0

  2. Gaunce – Foudy – Johnson8:37

    xG 0.58–0.16 (78%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  3. Nyquist – Chinakhov – Sillinger12:19

    xG 0.45–0.45 (50%)attempts 14–13goals 0–1

  4. Gaudreau – Jenner – Bemstrom13:44

    xG 0.45–0.65 (41%)attempts 12–20goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGavrikov – Bjork6:31

    xG 0.92–0.20 (82%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  2. Gudbranson – Bjork3:15

    xG 0.54–0.03 (96%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  3. Gudbranson – Gavrikov3:20

    xG 0.12–0.00 (99%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.3 xGPHI 2.6 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #151 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.09 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 61% of the time.

CBJ winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).