Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 19, 2022·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Anaheim Ducks 2, St. Louis Blues 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 55% of the time.

STL winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA05114113232
STL21631315634

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:44STLNoel AcciariAssists: Justin Faulk, Brayden Schenn · Tip-in, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:07STLPavel BuchnevichAssists: Robert Thomas · Snap, 0.20 xG0–2
  3. P2 1:02STLPavel BuchnevichGWGAssists: Robert Thomas, Jordan Kyrou · Backhand, 0.10 xG0–3
  4. P2 4:52STLBrayden SchennAssists: Pavel Buchnevich · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–4
  5. P2 6:43ANACam FowlerPPAssists: Adam Henrique · Slap, 0.13 xG1–4
  6. P2 8:44STLTorey KrugPPAssists: Jordan Kyrou, Pavel Buchnevich · Slap, 0.18 xG1–5
  7. P3 8:41ANAAdam HenriquePPAssists: Cam Fowler, Mason McTavish · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–5
  8. P3 15:28STLRobert ThomasAssists: Jordan Kyrou · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–6
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 0:12ANAAdam Henrique: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P2 5:52STLCalle Rosen: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 7:42ANAJakob Silfverberg: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 13:41STLIvan Barbashev: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 2:03STLNoel Acciari: Interference2 min
  6. P3 7:55STLJustin Faulk: Slashing2 min · PPG
  7. P3 16:15ANABrett Leason: Cross checking2 min
  8. P3 16:15STLAlexey Toropchenko: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 19:55STLTyler Tucker: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 19:55ANASam Carrick: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
49% to win51% to win
← ANA attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zegras won the faceoff against O'Reilly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANASTL
32Shots on goal34
2.4Expected goals2.7
63Shot attempts47
30Faceoffs won28
4Power plays2
11Penalty minutes15
14Hits19
10Blocked shots20
2Giveaways12
14Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestCarrick – Lundeström – Regenda5:42

    xG 0.47–0.12 (80%)attempts 12–3goals 0–0

  2. Strome – Vatrano – McTavish4:43

    xG 0.22–0.18 (54%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  3. Henrique – Terry – Zegras10:09

    xG 0.23–0.29 (44%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1

  4. Silfverberg – Jones – Lundeström3:32

    xG 0.03–0.19 (14%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKulikov – Fowler8:15

    xG 0.52–0.37 (59%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0

  2. White – Strand10:52

    xG 0.14–0.23 (38%)attempts 6–3goals 0–2

  3. Klingberg – Benoit8:32

    xG 0.03–0.14 (19%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestSchenn – Barbashev – Acciari11:57

    xG 0.63–0.41 (61%)attempts 13–18goals 1–0

  2. O'Reilly – Leivo – Saad9:51

    xG 0.19–0.08 (71%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

  3. Buchnevich – Kyrou – Thomas11:23

    xG 0.65–0.61 (52%)attempts 9–15goals 3–0

  4. Pitlick – Toropchenko – Alexandrov8:44

    xG 0.10–0.18 (36%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFaulk – Krug15:33

    xG 0.95–0.48 (66%)attempts 15–18goals 4–0

  2. Rosen – Tucker14:20

    xG 0.54–0.39 (58%)attempts 15–16goals 0–0

  3. Leddy – Mikkola14:09

    xG 0.55–0.40 (58%)attempts 7–11goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.7 xGANA 2.4 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 24/100 · #1086 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.67 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 55% of the time.

STL winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).