Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 3, 2022·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Washington Capitals 2, Calgary Flames 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 73% of the time.

CGY winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WSH1150519229
CGY11411438536

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:03CGYBlake ColemanAssists: Adam Ruzicka, Mikael Backlund · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:26WSHConor ShearyPPAssists: Sonny Milano, Evgeny Kuznetsov · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:35CGYAndrew MangiapaneAssists: Mikael Backlund, Adam Ruzicka · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P3 13:39CGYAdam RuzickaGWGAssists: Mikael Backlund, Rasmus Andersson · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–3
  5. P3 14:34CGYAndrew MangiapaneAssists: Dillon Dube, Nazem Kadri · Snap, 0.09 xG1–4
  6. P3 18:54WSHJohn CarlsonAssists: Lars Eller, Dylan Strome · Snap, 0.21 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:56CGYElias LindholmENAssists: Tyler Toffoli, Chris Tanev · Tip-in, 0.79 xG2–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 13:11CGYNazem Kadri: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 18:27CGYDillon Dube: Roughing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 12:25WSHNick Jensen: Interference2 min
  4. P3 5:27CGYJonathan Huberdeau: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 16:41WSHDylan Strome: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 17:40WSHAlexander Alexeyev: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 17:56CGYJonathan Huberdeau: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
49% to win51% to win
← WSH attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lindholm won the faceoff against Eller
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHCGY
29Shots on goal36
2.2Expected goals3.5
49Shot attempts73
34Faceoffs won27
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
24Hits22
20Blocked shots10
4Giveaways11
6Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestEller – Johansson – Mantha2:05

    xG 0.15–0.04 (79%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Dowd – Hathaway – Protas6:33

    xG 0.17–0.09 (64%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Kuznetsov – Mantha – Milano8:17

    xG 0.34–0.28 (55%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  4. Ovechkin – Sheary – Strome7:10

    xG 0.23–0.30 (44%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. van Riemsdyk – Alexeyev8:43

    xG 0.36–0.34 (52%)attempts 7–9goals 0–1

  2. Carlson – van Riemsdyk3:09

    xG 0.06–0.15 (29%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  3. Jensen – Alexeyev3:54

    xG 0.02–0.14 (12%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestBacklund – Coleman – Ruzicka10:18

    xG 0.85–0.21 (80%)attempts 21–7goals 2–0

  2. Toffoli – Huberdeau – Lindholm10:48

    xG 0.38–0.23 (63%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  3. Kadri – Mangiapane – Dube12:16

    xG 0.49–0.36 (57%)attempts 14–11goals 1–0

  4. Lewis – Lucic – Rooney7:28

    xG 0.25–0.24 (50%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTanev – Weegar15:41

    xG 0.83–0.37 (69%)attempts 24–12goals 1–0

  2. Hanifin – Andersson17:22

    xG 0.90–0.49 (65%)attempts 22–13goals 2–0

  3. Stone – Zadorov13:31

    xG 0.53–0.35 (60%)attempts 13–11goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.5 xGWSH 2.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #713 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.08 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 49% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 73% of the time.

CGY winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).