Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 6, 2022·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Columbus Blue Jackets 1, Pittsburgh Penguins 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 59% of the time.

PIT winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ110013016139
PIT0931817434

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:00CBJJohnny GaudreauAssists: Patrik Laine · Snap, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:15PITBryan RustAssists: Brian Dumoulin · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:02PITSidney CrosbyGWGAssists: Jake Guentzel, Rickard Rakell · Wrist, 0.20 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:14PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Jake Guentzel, Evgeni Malkin · Tip-in, 0.14 xG1–3
  5. P3 16:33PITTeddy BluegerAssists: Bryan Rust · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 9:04PITBrock McGinn: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 13:01PITJake Guentzel: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 4:50PITJeff Carter: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 9:29CBJMarcus Bjork: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P2 10:14CBJKirill Marchenko: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  6. P2 14:13CBJTim Berni: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  7. P3 0:41CBJTim Berni: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 4:39PITJosh Archibald: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 14:45CBJGavin Bayreuther: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 16:20PITJeff Petry: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 19:12CBJGustav Nyquist: Interference goalkeeper2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
49% to win51% to win
← CBJ attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Kuraly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJPIT
39Shots on goal34
3.0Expected goals3.6
76Shot attempts59
30Faceoffs won27
5Power plays5
10Penalty minutes10
27Hits29
9Blocked shots25
4Giveaways8
5Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestNyquist – Chinakhov – Sillinger2:29

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  2. Marchenko – Chinakhov – Sillinger3:15

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Nyquist – Roslovic – Johnson5:34

    xG 0.24–0.39 (38%)attempts 5–6goals 0–1

  4. Kuraly – Olivier – Robinson8:34

    xG 0.45–0.64 (41%)attempts 8–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudbranson – Berni12:15

    xG 0.71–0.16 (82%)attempts 18–7goals 0–0

  2. Gavrikov – Bjork11:31

    xG 0.58–0.61 (49%)attempts 14–12goals 1–1

  3. Peeke – Bayreuther9:43

    xG 0.24–1.06 (19%)attempts 6–15goals 0–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Zucker – Rust6:45

    xG 0.91–0.44 (67%)attempts 11–6goals 1–1

  2. Crosby – Rakell – Guentzel13:34

    xG 0.97–0.51 (65%)attempts 15–17goals 1–0

  3. Archibald – Blueger – Heinen3:47

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Carter – McGinn – Kapanen6:42

    xG 0.18–0.47 (27%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDumoulin – Rutta11:41

    xG 0.94–0.63 (60%)attempts 13–15goals 1–1

  2. Ruhwedel – Joseph10:17

    xG 0.65–0.34 (66%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

  3. Petry – Pettersson13:39

    xG 0.72–0.97 (43%)attempts 15–26goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.6 xGCBJ 3.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 32/100 · #969 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.09 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 33% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 59% of the time.

PIT winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).