Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 9, 2022·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Minnesota Wild 2, Edmonton Oilers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 71% of the time.

EDM winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN110116018244
EDM21511429538

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:45EDMDerek RyanAssists: Devin Shore, Klim Kostin · Snap, 0.28 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:59EDMConnor McDavidPPAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Tyson Barrie · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–2
  3. P1 11:24MINJoel Eriksson EkUnassisted · Snap, 0.32 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:22MINMats ZuccarelloPPAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Jared Spurgeon · Snap, 0.17 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:54EDMKailer YamamotoGWGAssists: Darnell Nurse, Cody Ceci · Tip-in, 0.06 xG2–3
  6. P3 3:43EDMLeon DraisaitlPPAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Connor McDavid · Slap, 0.22 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:51EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsENAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Zach Hyman · Snap, 0.75 xG2–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 8:07MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 14:29EDMKailer Yamamoto: Holding2 min
  3. P2 4:21EDMBrett Kulak: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 4:45EDMMattias Janmark: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 19:55EDMLeon Draisaitl: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 3:16MINMathew Dumba: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 10:29EDMBrett Kulak: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 14:43MINSam Steel: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
49% to win51% to win
← MIN attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Nugent-Hopkins won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINEDM
44Shots on goal38
6.1Expected goals4.5
65Shot attempts56
39Faceoffs won38
5Power plays3
6Penalty minutes10
24Hits22
13Blocked shots15
8Giveaways14
4Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek10:28

    xG 0.69–0.27 (72%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

  2. Petan – Gaudreau – Boldy7:24

    xG 0.46–0.59 (44%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  3. Zuccarello – Kaprizov – Steel11:01

    xG 0.47–0.75 (39%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

  4. Reaves – Shaw – Dewar8:10

    xG 0.12–1.12 (9%)attempts 6–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGoligoski – Merrill13:11

    xG 0.83–0.31 (73%)attempts 10–12goals 1–0

  2. Spurgeon – Brodin2:46

    xG 0.23–0.09 (72%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Brodin – Dumba17:07

    xG 0.78–1.39 (36%)attempts 16–15goals 0–1

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestShore – Ryan – Kostin7:22

    xG 0.92–0.35 (72%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0

  2. Puljujarvi – Hamblin – Holloway6:29

    xG 0.43–0.04 (92%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  3. Hyman – Draisaitl – McDavid14:11

    xG 0.86–0.78 (52%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  4. Nugent-Hopkins – Janmark – Yamamoto12:24

    xG 0.46–0.92 (33%)attempts 11–13goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouchard – Broberg13:08

    xG 1.00–0.27 (79%)attempts 15–10goals 0–0

  2. Barrie – Kulak12:49

    xG 0.99–0.54 (65%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  3. Ceci – Nurse16:20

    xG 1.17–1.08 (52%)attempts 20–14goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 4.5 xGMIN 6.1 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 70/100 · #452 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.33 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 71% of the time.

EDM winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).