Fri, Dec 9, 2022·T-Mobile Arena, Paradise
Philadelphia Flyers 1, Vegas Golden Knights 2 (OT)
Three stars
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 59% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 09 | 112 | 06 | 01 | 128 |
| VGK | 18 | 015 | 010 | 11 | 234 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 11:45VGKWilliam CarrierUnassisted · Backhand, 0.13 xG0–1
- P2 1:47PHIScott LaughtonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–1
- OT 3:21VGKJonathan MarchessaultGWGUnassisted · Backhand, 0.21 xG1–2
Penalties (2)
- P2 9:36PHIScott Laughton: Tripping2 min
- P3 17:04PHINoah Cates: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Roy won the faceoff against Cates
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Philadelphia Flyers
Forward lines
- bestvan Riemsdyk – MacEwen – Frost10:51
xG 0.46–0.11 (81%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0
- Hayes – Konecny – Cates14:04
xG 0.47–0.35 (58%)attempts 20–15goals 0–0
- Laughton – Tippett – Farabee10:48
xG 0.25–0.22 (53%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0
- Deslauriers – Sedlak – Brown9:02
xG 0.13–0.33 (29%)attempts 5–11goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestBraun – Sanheim15:19
xG 0.74–0.46 (62%)attempts 20–18goals 1–0
- Sanheim – York2:28
xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Seeler – York11:28
xG 0.26–0.25 (51%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0
Vegas Golden Knights
Forward lines
- bestStone – Eichel – Cotter5:37
xG 0.30–0.13 (69%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0
- Smith – Karlsson – Marchessault13:17
xG 0.44–0.37 (55%)attempts 19–11goals 0–0
- Kessel – Stephenson – Leschyshyn4:21
xG 0.13–0.13 (48%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0
- Kessel – Leschyshyn – Cotter2:56
xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Martinez – Whitecloud17:34
xG 0.26–0.27 (49%)attempts 12–13goals 0–0
- McNabb – Theodore21:11
xG 0.79–0.86 (48%)attempts 30–23goals 1–0
- Hague – Miromanov13:53
xG 0.33–0.66 (33%)attempts 14–16goals 0–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
VGK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VGK is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 59% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (VGK − PHI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).