Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 11, 2022·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Colorado Avalanche 3, St. Louis Blues 2 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 63% of the time.

STL winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
COL0101811112331
STL0901121200232

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 10:58COLMikko RantanenAssists: Alex Newhook, Brad Hunt · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P3 8:01STLVladimir TarasenkoPPAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Robert Thomas · Snap, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P3 18:24STLBrandon SaadSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–2
  4. P3 19:51COLMikko RantanenAssists: J.T. Compher, Devon Toews · Deflected, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. OT 0:29COLMikko RantanenGWGAssists: Cale Makar, Valeri Nichushkin · Wrist, 0.27 xG3–2
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 7:08COLAlex Newhook: Holding2 min
  2. P1 8:35COLDevon Toews: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P1 14:28STLRobert Thomas: Holding2 min
  4. P2 7:37STLColton Parayko: Slashing2 min
  5. P3 7:52COLCale Makar: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  6. P3 17:18STLBrayden Schenn: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
49% to win51% to win
← COL attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Rantanen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLSTL
31Shots on goal32
2.4Expected goals1.7
51Shot attempts53
24Faceoffs won36
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
21Hits26
11Blocked shots12
7Giveaways6
11Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLehkonen – Nichushkin – Rantanen8:34

    xG 0.39–0.15 (72%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  2. Hudon – Foudy – Meyers5:08

    xG 0.22–0.14 (62%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Compher – Nichushkin – Rantanen2:32

    xG 0.09–0.15 (38%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Cogliano – Compher – O'Connor8:26

    xG 0.01–0.21 (6%)attempts 2–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Girard3:25

    xG 0.37–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Hunt – Englund5:05

    xG 0.21–0.17 (55%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Toews7:44

    xG 0.07–0.10 (40%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestO'Reilly – Schenn – Leivo12:26

    xG 0.48–0.34 (58%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0

  2. Saad – Barbashev – Acciari4:03

    xG 0.21–0.09 (70%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Pitlick – Saad – Barbashev5:37

    xG 0.17–0.09 (66%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  4. Walker – Acciari – Bitten3:20

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeddy – Parayko16:31

    xG 0.66–0.60 (52%)attempts 17–15goals 0–0

  2. Bortuzzo – Mikkola7:25

    xG 0.07–0.02 (79%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Parayko – Mikkola2:10

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 1.7 xGCOL 2.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #190 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.46 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 3% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 63% of the time.

STL winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).