Thu, Dec 15, 2022·United Center, Chicago
Vegas Golden Knights 4, Chicago Blackhawks 1
Three stars
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Vegas Golden Knights win this game 77% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGK | 112 | 14 | 29 | 425 |
| CHI | 07 | 07 | 111 | 125 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 14:41VGKChandler StephensonPPAssists: Mark Stone, Jonathan Marchessault · Snap, 0.23 xG1–0
- P2 3:56VGKReilly SmithSHGWGAssists: William Karlsson · Slap, 0.25 xG2–0
- P3 8:08VGKPhil KesselAssists: Daniil Miromanov, William Karlsson · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–0
- P3 16:06CHITaylor RaddyshAssists: Jonathan Toews, Seth Jones · Snap, 0.06 xG3–1
- P3 19:30VGKReilly SmithENAssists: Jonathan Marchessault, Brayden Pachal · Wrist, 0.79 xG4–1
Penalties (3)
- P1 13:45CHIJason Dickinson: Boarding2 min · PPG
- P1 16:47VGKDaniil Miromanov: Tripping2 min
- P2 3:09VGKMichael Amadio: Holding2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Roy won the faceoff against Domi
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Vegas Golden Knights
Forward lines
- bestKessel – Amadio – Leschyshyn6:51
xG 0.51–0.14 (78%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0
- Smith – Karlsson – Marchessault9:18
xG 0.44–0.09 (83%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0
- Stone – Stephenson – Cotter7:38
xG 0.14–0.05 (74%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Carrier – Kolesar – Roy9:55
xG 0.10–0.20 (34%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestHutton – Pachal14:02
xG 0.69–0.19 (78%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0
- McNabb – Miromanov17:49
xG 0.75–0.79 (49%)attempts 15–16goals 0–0
- Martinez – Hague18:17
xG 0.35–0.46 (44%)attempts 11–15goals 0–1
Chicago Blackhawks
Forward lines
- Kane – Domi – Lafferty14:05
xG 0.48–0.51 (48%)attempts 18–8goals 0–0
- Blackwell – Khaira – Entwistle6:37
xG 0.07–0.12 (37%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0
- Johnson – Athanasiou – Dickinson7:58
xG 0.00–0.09 (1%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0
- Athanasiou – Dickinson – Entwistle2:58
xG 0.00–0.20 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestJones – Jones2:18
xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0
- McCabe – Jones16:45
xG 0.34–0.26 (57%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0
- Tinordi – Murphy12:56
xG 0.26–0.25 (50%)attempts 10–7goals 0–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it VGK. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Vegas Golden Knights win this game 77% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (CHI − VGK), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).