Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 18, 2022·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Calgary Flames 5, San Jose Sharks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 68% of the time.

SJS winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CGY1101738525
SJS13013110226

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:13CGYTyler ToffoliUnassisted · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:11SJSTimo MeierPPAssists: Erik Karlsson, Tomas Hertl · Slap, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:01CGYMilan LucicAssists: Elias Lindholm, Trevor Lewis · Snap, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P3 0:16CGYElias LindholmPPGWGAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Nazem Kadri · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–1
  5. P3 0:35CGYElias LindholmAssists: Rasmus Andersson, Noah Hanifin · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–1
  6. P3 2:10CGYDillon DubeAssists: Nazem Kadri, Tyler Toffoli · Wrist, 0.13 xG5–1
  7. P3 7:56SJSTomas HertlPPAssists: Logan Couture, Erik Karlsson · Backhand, 0.14 xG5–2
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 11:06CGYAdam Ruzicka: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 15:00SJSJaycob Megna: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 1:11SJSTimo Meier: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 8:30CGYBlake Coleman: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 11:09SJSJonah Gadjovich: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 11:09CGYDennis Gilbert: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 18:09CGYJonathan Huberdeau: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 0:06SJSTomas Hertl: High sticking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 7:50CGYElias Lindholm: Tripping2 min · PPG
  10. P3 8:12CGYMacKenzie Weegar: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  11. P3 14:58CGYJonathan Huberdeau: Interference2 min
  12. P3 16:46SJSKevin Labanc: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  13. P3 19:44CGYMikael Backlund: High sticking double minor4 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
49% to win51% to win
← CGY attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lindholm won the faceoff against Couture
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYSJS
25Shots on goal26
3.4Expected goals2.3
55Shot attempts41
33Faceoffs won40
4Power plays7
21Penalty minutes13
23Hits26
6Blocked shots14
6Giveaways10
10Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestBacklund – Coleman – Ruzicka3:58

    xG 0.26–0.10 (73%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Kadri – Huberdeau – Mangiapane8:52

    xG 0.36–0.27 (57%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  3. Toffoli – Lindholm – Dube9:11

    xG 0.47–0.43 (52%)attempts 10–9goals 2–0

  4. Lewis – Lucic – Backlund2:34

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHanifin – Andersson13:25

    xG 0.98–0.20 (83%)attempts 15–7goals 4–0

  2. Weegar – Zadorov14:58

    xG 0.72–0.20 (78%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0

  3. Stone – Gilbert3:14

    xG 0.02–0.08 (22%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. Nieto – Hertl – Meier5:49

    xG 0.18–0.25 (42%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. Labanc – Svechnikov – Sturm4:17

    xG 0.17–0.26 (40%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Lorentz – Gregor – Gadjovich5:51

    xG 0.38–0.53 (42%)attempts 4–7goals 0–1

  4. Nieto – Svechnikov – Sturm3:13

    xG 0.05–0.20 (18%)attempts 1–2goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHarrington – Simek8:45

    xG 0.41–0.33 (55%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1

  2. Karlsson – Simek2:33

    xG 0.16–0.15 (52%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Vlasic – Benning12:29

    xG 0.31–0.43 (42%)attempts 7–10goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.3 xGCGY 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 44/100 · #824 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.16 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 68% of the time.

SJS winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).