Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Jan 6, 2023·Honda Center, Anaheim

San Jose Sharks 4, Anaheim Ducks 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 69% of the time.

ANA winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
SJS2132200800441
ANA210191911529

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:38SJSMatt NietoAssists: Alexander Barabanov, Marc-Edouard Vlasic · Tip-in, 0.16 xG1–0
  2. P1 6:03SJSSteven LorentzAssists: Erik Karlsson, Jonah Gadjovich · Tip-in, 0.08 xG2–0
  3. P1 6:38ANATrevor ZegrasAssists: John Klingberg, Frank Vatrano · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P1 14:15ANARyan StromeAssists: Mason McTavish, Colton White · Tip-in, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P2 10:16SJSTimo MeierAssists: Kevin Labanc, Tomas Hertl · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P2 13:06ANAMason McTavishAssists: Jakob Silfverberg, Simon Benoit · Tip-in, 0.15 xG3–3
  7. P2 13:20SJSTimo MeierAssists: Kevin Labanc, Matt Benning · Tip-in, 0.10 xG4–3
  8. P3 13:13ANAMason McTavishAssists: Adam Henrique · Snap, 0.08 xG4–4
  9. OT 1:08ANAJohn KlingbergGWGAssists: Troy Terry, Mason McTavish · Wrist, 0.19 xG4–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 6:14SJSJonah Gadjovich: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 6:14ANASam Carrick: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 7:09SJSTomas Hertl: Roughing removing opponents helmet2 min
  4. P1 10:37SJSSteven Lorentz: High sticking double minor4 min
  5. P1 12:44ANATroy Terry: Interference2 min
  6. P1 14:45ANASam Carrick: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 13:13SJSKevin Labanc: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
49% to win51% to win
← SJS attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couture won the faceoff against McTavish
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSANA
41Shots on goal29
4.9Expected goals3.5
66Shot attempts70
24Faceoffs won40
2Power plays4
13Penalty minutes9
21Hits18
17Blocked shots9
7Giveaways8
6Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestHertl – Labanc – Meier13:03

    xG 2.18–0.44 (83%)attempts 28–11goals 2–0

  2. Bonino – Svechnikov – Sturm8:38

    xG 0.87–0.21 (81%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  3. Lindblom – Lorentz – Gadjovich7:09

    xG 0.42–0.12 (78%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  4. Couture – Nieto – Barabanov10:48

    xG 0.39–0.40 (49%)attempts 9–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Megna13:18

    xG 1.91–0.25 (88%)attempts 23–7goals 2–0

  2. Vlasic – Benning11:11

    xG 0.72–0.40 (64%)attempts 13–11goals 1–2

  3. Harrington – Ferraro16:13

    xG 1.30–1.39 (48%)attempts 15–29goals 0–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. Strome – Terry – Zegras2:28

    xG 0.11–0.07 (61%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Megna – Kirkland – Leason7:27

    xG 0.32–0.39 (45%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  3. Silfverberg – Carrick – Comtois8:51

    xG 0.25–0.86 (23%)attempts 10–13goals 0–0

  4. Strome – Vatrano – Zegras13:02

    xG 0.78–1.49 (34%)attempts 17–20goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Fowler – Klingberg8:07

    xG 0.24–0.39 (38%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  2. White – Vaakanainen10:27

    xG 0.36–0.61 (37%)attempts 8–12goals 1–1

  3. Kulikov – Benoit5:57

    xG 0.12–0.38 (23%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.5 xGSJS 4.9 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANASJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #41 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.65 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 69% of the time.

ANA winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).